cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
1563
Views
5
Helpful
6
Replies

WS-C3560X-24T-L abnormal log

Hello everyone,


Thesedays. There is displaying a abnormal log on Catalyst 3560.and it's high level alarm log.this log as below:

001704: Sep 10 2018 09:50:04.400 BJT: %IPC-2-INVALIDZONE: Invalid IPC Zone 0x40000000.
-Traceback= 4E0750z DA3208z 4909Cz 491A4z 2699EF8z 269464Cz
001705: Sep 10 2018 09:50:04.774 BJT: %IPC-2-INVALIDZONE: Invalid IPC Zone 0x40000000.
-Traceback= 4E0750z DA3208z 4909Cz 491A4z 2699EF8z 269464Cz
001706: Sep 10 2018 09:50:04.895 BJT: %IPC-2-INVALIDZONE: Invalid IPC Zone 0x40000000.
-Traceback= 4E0750z DA3208z 4909Cz 491A4z 2699EF8z 269464Cz
001707: Sep 10 2018 09:50:04.903 BJT: %IPC-2-INVALIDZONE: Invalid IPC Zone 0x40000000.
-Traceback= 4E0750z DA3208z 4909Cz 491A4z 2699EF8z 269464Cz


what's meaning about this log, and how to fix it.

thanks.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rps-Cheers | If it solves your problem, please mark as answer. Thanks !
1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

I would aim to upgrade to the listed 15.0(2)SE8 at the very least, suggest 15.0(2)SE11 for that platform.

 

Just because a version is not listed under affected doesn't mean it is not. It merely means it has not been reported/ tested for that bug. 

 

cheers,

Seb.

View solution in original post

6 Replies 6

Seb Rupik
VIP Alumni
VIP Alumni

Hi there,

It could be related to this bug:

 

https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCut05808/?rfs=iqvred

 

..are you running the affected software version? At the very, suggest upgrading to one of the versions listed as a known fixed release.

 

cheers,

Seb.

Hi Seb:

Yes,i have notice this bug,the 3560 switch version 15.0(2)SE5.but the bug affected release is 15.0(1)SE1.So,i don't know how to do it.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rps-Cheers | If it solves your problem, please mark as answer. Thanks !

I would aim to upgrade to the listed 15.0(2)SE8 at the very least, suggest 15.0(2)SE11 for that platform.

 

Just because a version is not listed under affected doesn't mean it is not. It merely means it has not been reported/ tested for that bug. 

 

cheers,

Seb.

In addtion,if it's just this bug,how to fix it by filter the UDP(1975),Is there any configuration example.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rps-Cheers | If it solves your problem, please mark as answer. Thanks !

This bug is identical:

 

https://bst.cloudapps.cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuq58584

 

...the workaround is a bit more descriptive.

Looks like creating an inbound ACL on all SVIs to deny UDP/1975  , which seems like it could have an effect on production traffic. 

 

Perhaps these UDP packets are making it to the control plane which is causing an issue. Suggest you configure CPP filter out these packets and see if that resolves the issue. Ideally upgrade the IOS.

 

cheers,

Seb.

Yes, i also find this bug,anyway,thank you very much!my idea is the same to yours. ^_^
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Rps-Cheers | If it solves your problem, please mark as answer. Thanks !
Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card