09-26-2006 11:38 AM - edited 03-17-2019 08:48 PM
Hi,
we have two remote sites connected to each other using a GRE tunnel. I wanted to apply a QoS policy to ensure two video cameras can have at least 400kbps bandwidth available. When I apply this QoS policy to the Tunnel interface I am getting error message saying CBWFQ is not supported.
policy-map polycom-pm
class polycom-cm
bandwidth 400
class class-default
(config-if)#service-policy output polycom-pm
Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing not supported on interface Tunnel12
does anyone know of any tricks to get around this problem and be able to reserve/guarantee bandwidth across a GRE tunnel?
Thank you!
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-26-2006 10:28 PM
Hi
If I remember correctly you need to apply the QoS policy to the physical interface, and then use the qos pre-classify command on the tunnel interface...
This copies packet markings into the extra tunnel header (which is all that intermediate devices will see).
See this link:
Regards
Aaron
Please rate helpful posts...
09-26-2006 10:28 PM
Hi
If I remember correctly you need to apply the QoS policy to the physical interface, and then use the qos pre-classify command on the tunnel interface...
This copies packet markings into the extra tunnel header (which is all that intermediate devices will see).
See this link:
Regards
Aaron
Please rate helpful posts...
09-30-2006 09:49 AM
Aaron,
thanks for the guidelines. I had to look through http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns241/c649/ccmigration_09186a00801ea79c.pdf to figure out the exact configuration for QoS over GRE over IPSEC ; the trick is to apply "qos pre-classify" to both tunnel and crypto map.
thanks again.
John.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide