01-30-2014 03:59 AM - edited 03-01-2019 11:29 AM
Hi there,
I have a question in regard to placement of vnic's in UCS specifically to the vCon assignment.
In my system I have B200M3 servers with the UCS Vic1240+mlom port expander card.
What I'm wondering is how many vCon's I have in my system? From what I have read, each vCon is the virtual representation of the physical adapter, so in my case I would have a single vCon. This would make sense, because when I look at where the system has placed my vnics, they are all associated to vCon1.
However, when I look at the "Modify vNIC/vHBA Placement" and do a specify manually, I see four vCons (vCon1 - vCon4). Are these there by default, and/or should I be able to use vCons 2-4? If I am able to, then I wonder why the system has only chosen to use vCon1 ?
Any assistance in this understanding would be gratefuly received!
Thanks
Dominic
Solved! Go to Solution.
01-30-2014 10:25 AM
vcon is equivalent to physical I/O adaptor; in your case VIC-1240 + port expander is 1 I/O adaptor, therefore you have only one vcon.
the fact that 4 vcon's appear, has to do with the fact, that UCS C-Series servers can have up to 4 I/O adaptors; B-Series servers are limited at the moment to 2 I/O adaptors.
01-30-2014 10:25 AM
vcon is equivalent to physical I/O adaptor; in your case VIC-1240 + port expander is 1 I/O adaptor, therefore you have only one vcon.
the fact that 4 vcon's appear, has to do with the fact, that UCS C-Series servers can have up to 4 I/O adaptors; B-Series servers are limited at the moment to 2 I/O adaptors.
01-31-2014 03:05 AM
Great thanks very much, it's as I thought, just wasn't sure why I saw 4x vCons, but now I know.
01-31-2014 07:09 AM
The only question remains is; Suppose you always want to have a specific order with one adapter, but once you move a Service Profile to another server with two adapters, you want them to be spread amongst these two adapters in a round-robin fashion. For example:
One Adapter: vCon 1:
1 - iSCSI_Eth0
2 - iSCSI_Eth1
3 - Eth0
4 - Eth1
5 - VM_vEth0
6 - VM_vEth1
Now if you move above configuration to another server with two adapters:
First Adapter: vCon 1:
1 - iSCSI_Eth0
2 - Eth0
3 - VM_vEth0
Second Adapter: vCon 2:
1 - iSCSI_Eth1
2 - Eth1
3 - VM_vEth1
Is this correct? I think I have to alway spread them amongst two vCons or select automatic placement, right? With boot from iSCSI this can be tricky.
Boudewijn
01-31-2014 07:24 AM
I usually recommend the following
1) use different service profiles for blades with one resp. two I/O adaptors
2) never use automatic vnic/vhba placement, do it manually
3) do you really need 2 adaptors ? in most environments one is enough (VIC-1240 plus extender counts as one)
4) avoid any rathole discussion about the MTBF resp. single point of failure of the single I/O adaptor; I have never seen a failing I/O adaptor, and btw. there are other single point of failures on the blade; thats why you would scale horizontally, and setup e.g. a DRS cluster
01-31-2014 07:45 AM
I fully agree. I don't need or want two adapters. In our case we use a VIC 1240 + port expander. But of course you want to have the correct settup in case of scalability, blade/server replacement and so on. Just curious about it.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide