Just wondering if routing protocol control traffic (hellos/updates/etc) is queued preferentially to normal traffic, on a serial link? Assuming *no* QoS/MQC is configured on either end of the link? Also, are pings treated with lesser priority than nor...
Does anyone here operate their routers & switches without a username specified? We don't use the username in our login or enable authentication (use vty and enable passwords), just wondering if there is some requirement for a username that I don't kn...
I have several 2960/2640 switches with "ip default-gateway" configured. However, the IP of the default gateway recently changed, and the old gateway IP is no longer active. But these 2960's still try to send *some* outbound traffic using the old ga...
If you are asking how to reach this camera remotely, using its wrong IP, I know of one possible way. You can set the wrong subnet as a secondary network on the default router for that LAN. Then from the router you can telnet or ssh to the camera's ba...
If OSPF allows these (bad) timer settings, I would guess they would become neighbors, but after the dead interval expires, the relationship would drop. Then the hellos would be sent out again and neighbors would form again, forming an unending cycle.
One workaround it to keep using your "no logging event link-status" status on the ports, but also configure buffer/syslog logging of all configuration changes, which would record any admin shutdown port changes (along with all other config changes). ...
Palani, I read the first link you mentioned, and that only applies to interfaces with a service policy (MQC) applied. My question is for an interface with no QoS at all.
As for pings, I meant ping traffic in general, not generated by the router itsel...
I just looked up multiple priority queues in my Szigeti book. They are allowed, but like Joe D mentioned, there is a single priority queue that they all share.
Here's a Cisco diagram that might help:
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/i/200001-300...
