Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
- Cisco Community
- :
- About xzjleo2005
Stats
Member since
02-16-2006
149
Posts
10
Helpful
1
Solution
02-26-2013
12:17 PM
Hi Parthiv, The ASR can reach the SNMP server, if I tested the OSPF trap, it will be sent out. Thanks. Leo
... View more
02-25-2013
05:39 PM
Hi From your debug, it only showed trap has been queueing, but it has not been sent out. From my snmp test trap debug, I could see it's queueing, but it hadn't been sent out at the end. Thanks. Leo
... View more
02-25-2013
02:04 PM
Hi Following is the current config, two strange things here, once I added the commands you suggested, the snmp-server traps bgp command was gone. When I run the snmp test, there still no BGP traps had been generated. The second part is the output of debug snmp test-tarp and debug snmp trap. snmp-server ifindex persist snmp-server vrf det context xxxxxx ! snmp-server host x.x.x.x traps version 2c xxxxxx snmp-server host y.y.y.y traps version 2c xxxxxx snmp-server community encrypted 111D1C1603 RO snmp-server community encrypted xxxxxx RW snmp-server traps rf snmp-server traps ospf state-change neighbor-state-change snmp-server packetsize 1024 snmp-server trap-source MgmtEth0/RSP0/CPU0/0 snmp-server community-map xxxxxx context xxxxxx RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1#snmp test trap routing bgp state-change Tue Feb 26 08:58:16.941 AEST RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 26 08:58:17.022 : test_trap[65888]: Debug init Done RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 26 08:58:17.411 : test_trap[446]: Trap ID: 28 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 26 08:58:17.411 : test_trap[446]: make_test_traps: input args 0x0 0x0 (null) (null) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 26 08:58:17.411 : test_trap[446]: get_first_bgp_peer_index: Getting first BGP Peer RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 26 08:58:17.424 : test_trap[446]: get_first_bgp_peer_index: First BGP bgp_peer=0x996BC701 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 26 08:58:17.424 : test_trap[446]: make_test_trap_bgp: BGP Trap for peer_addr = 0x996BC701 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 26 08:58:17.429 : test_trap[446]: make_test_trap_bgp: Sending BGP FSM State Change Trap RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 26 08:58:17.430 : test_trap[446]: make_test_trap_bgp: Done BGP FSM State Change Trap RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 26 08:58:17.430 : snmpd[1110]: t8 Queueing trap:ciscoMgmt.187.0.1 qlen:0 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 26 08:58:17.431 : snmpd[1110]: t11 Processing trap ciscoMgmt.187.0.1
... View more
02-25-2013
12:33 PM
Hi I already tried that out, but ASR still didn't send out the trap for BGP up down. I opened a ticket in TAC, from their response, seems XR doesn't support generating snmp traps for BGP session under a vrf, do you know if this is the case? Thanks. Leo
... View more
02-21-2013
07:41 PM
Hi, here you are, there are two traps have been sent out to two differnet hosts. =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= PuTTY log 2013.02.22 14:32:11 =~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~=~= RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1# RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1#sh install act RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1#sh install active sum RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1#sh install active summary Fri Feb 22 14:32:19.364 AEST Active Packages: disk0:asr9k-mini-p-4.2.0 disk0:asr9k-doc-p-4.2.0 disk0:asr9k-k9sec-p-4.2.0 disk0:asr9k-p-4.2.0.CSCtw65376-1.0.0 disk0:asr9k-mpls-p-4.2.0 disk0:asr9k-mgbl-p-4.2.0 disk0:asr9k-mcast-p-4.2.0 disk0:asr9k-p-4.2.0.CSCty91147-1.0.0 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1# RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1# RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1#sh snmp Fri Feb 22 14:32:24.587 AEST Chassis: 0 SNMP packets input 0 Bad SNMP version errors 0 Unknown community name 0 Illegal operation for community name supplied 0 Encoding errors 0 Number of requested variables 0 Number of altered variables 0 Get-request PDUs 0 Get-next PDUs 0 Set-request PDUs 0 SNMP packets output 0 Too big errors (Maximum packet size 1024) 0 No such name errors 0 Bad values errors 0 General errors 0 Response PDUs 0 Trap PDUs SNMP logging: Enabled Logging to Notification host: x.x.x.x, udp-port: 162 Trap Statistics --------------- Number of pkts in Trap Queue: 0 Maximum length of Trap Queue: 100 Number of pkts sent: 0 Number of pkts dropped: 0 Logging to Notification host: x.x.x.x, udp-port: 162 Trap Statistics --------------- Number of pkts in Trap Queue: 0 Maximum length of Trap Queue: 100 Number of pkts sent: 0 Number of pkts dropped: 0 Inform Statistics ----------------- Number of Informs sent: 0 Number of Informs retries: 0 Number of Informs pending: 0 Number of Informs dropped: 0 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1# RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1# RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1#debug snmp trap RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1#debug snmp trap Fri Feb 22 14:33:01.524 AEST RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:PE1-ASR9000-DC1#RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:29.278 : exec[65888]: %SECURITY-login-6-AUTHEN_SUCCESS : Successfully authenticated user 'lxu1' from '172.31.170.197' on 'vty2' LC/0/6/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.082 : ifmgr[194]: %PKT_INFRA-LINK-5-CHANGED : Interface TenGigE0/6/0/2, changed state to Administratively Down LC/0/6/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.085 : bfd_agent[124]: %L2-BFD-6-ADJACENCY_DELETE : Adjacency to neighbor x.x.x.x on interface TenGigE0/6/0/2 was deleted RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.093 : ospf[1011]: %ROUTING-OSPF-5-ADJCHG : Process 1, Nbr x.x.x.x on TenGigE0/6/0/2 in area 0 from FULL to DOWN, Neighbor Down: interface down or detached,vrf default vrfid 0x60000000 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.102 : snmpd[1110]: t8 Queueing trap:ospfTrap.2.2 qlen:0 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.104 : snmpd[1110]: t14 Processing trap ospfTrap.2.2 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.106 : snmpd[1110]: t14 snmp_enqueue_trap:spawning a ping process (ping -R default -c 2 -t 0 x.x.x.x) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.109 : mpls_ldp[1042]: %ROUTING-LDP-5-SESSION_PROTECTION : Session hold up initiated for peer x.x.x.x:0 LC/0/6/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.106 : bfd_agent[124]: %L2-BFD-6-SESSION_REMOVED : BFD session to neighbor x.x.x.x on interface TenGigE0/6/0/2 has been removed RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.502 : snmpd[1110]: t14 Type escape sequence to abort. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.888 : snmpd[1110]: t14 Sending 2, 100-byte ICMP Echos to x.x.x.x, timeout is 0 seconds: RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.996 : snmpd[1110]: t14 .. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:41.996 : snmpd[1110]: t14 Success rate is 0 percent (0/2) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:43.467 : snmpd[1110]: t14 Queueing packet to x.x.x.x-162 from 172.31.165.202-161 (VRF default) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:43.467 : snmpd[1110]: t14 TRAP-LOG: Failed: rc:0x4fdd9c00 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:43.468 : snmpd[1110]: t14 snmp_enqueue_trap:spawning a ping process (ping -R default -c 2 -t 0 x.x.x.x) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:43.706 : snmpd[1110]: t14 Type escape sequence to abort. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:44.011 : snmpd[1110]: t14 Sending 2, 100-byte ICMP Echos to x.x.x.x, timeout is 0 seconds: RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:44.118 : snmpd[1110]: t14 .. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:44.118 : snmpd[1110]: t14 Success rate is 0 percent (0/2) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:45.587 : snmpd[1110]: t14 Queueing packet to x.x.x.x-162 from 172.31.165.202-161 (VRF default) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:45.587 : snmpd[1110]: t14 TRAP-LOG: Failed: rc:0x4fdd9c00 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:45.601 : snmpd[1110]: t1 SNMP trap Packet sent via UDP to x.x.x.x:162 from 172.31.165.202:161 (VRF default) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:33:45.839 : snmpd[1110]: t1 SNMP trap Packet sent via UDP to x.x.x.x:162 from 172.31.165.202:161 (VRF default) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:03.312 : tcp[424]: %IP-TCP_NSR-5-DISABLED : x.x.x.x:179 <-> x.x.x.x:16515:: NSR disabled for TCP connection because Retransmission threshold exceeded RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:03.313 : bgp[1047]: %ROUTING-BGP-3-NBR_NSR_DISABLED : NSR disabled on neighbor x.x.x.x due to TCP retransmissions RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:03.312 : bgp[1047]: %ROUTING-BGP-5-NBR_NSR_DISABLED_STANDBY : NSR disabled on neighbor x.x.x.x on standby due to Peer closing down the session (VRF: default) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:03.316 : tcp[424]: %IP-TCP_NSR-5-DISABLED : x.x.x.x:25894 <-> x.x.x.x:179:: NSR disabled for TCP connection because Retransmission threshold exceeded RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:03.317 : bgp[1047]: %ROUTING-BGP-5-NBR_NSR_DISABLED_STANDBY : NSR disabled on neighbor x.x.x.x on standby due to Peer closing down the session (VRF: default) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:04.025 : tcp[424]: %IP-TCP_NSR-5-DISABLED : x.x.x.x:179 <-> x.x.x.x:51713:: NSR disabled for TCP connection because Retransmission threshold exceeded RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:04.026 : bgp[1047]: %ROUTING-BGP-5-NBR_NSR_DISABLED_STANDBY : NSR disabled on neighbor x.x.x.x on standby due to Peer closing down the session (VRF: default) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:04.029 : tcp[424]: %IP-TCP_NSR-5-DISABLED : x.x.x.x:179 <-> x.x.x.x:59304:: NSR disabled for TCP connection because Retransmission threshold exceeded RP/0/RSP1/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:04.032 : bgp[1047]: %ROUTING-BGP-5-NBR_NSR_DISABLED_STANDBY : NSR disabled on neighbor x.x.x.x on standby due to Peer closing down the session (VRF: default) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:19.127 : bgp[1047]: %ROUTING-BGP-5-ADJCHANGE_DETAIL : neighbor x.x.x.x Down - BGP Notification sent, hold time expired (VRF: default; AFI/SAFI: 1/128, 1/66) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:20.120 : bgp[1047]: %ROUTING-BGP-5-ADJCHANGE_DETAIL : neighbor x.x.x.x Down - BGP Notification sent, hold time expired (VRF: default; AFI/SAFI: 25/65) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:20.162 : bgp[1047]: %ROUTING-BGP-5-ADJCHANGE_DETAIL : neighbor x.x.x.x Down - BGP Notification sent, hold time expired (VRF: default; AFI/SAFI: 25/65) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:27.792 : config[65889]: %MGBL-SYS-5-CONFIG_I : Configured from console by lxu1 on vty2 (172.31.170.197) RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 14:34:29.501 : bgp[1047]: %ROUTING-BGP-5-ADJCHANGE_DETAIL : neighbor x.x.x.x Down - BGP Notification sent, hold time expired (VRF: default; AFI/SAFI: 1/128, 1/66)
... View more
02-21-2013
07:01 PM
We are trying to test the snmp trap on IOS-XR for BGP up down, but ASR didn't send out any traps when we brought down the BGP neighbour. When we tested the OSPF, it worked fine. I also tried to use command 'snmp test' to generate the test trap and I got following message, T he version is 4.2. Any suggestions? Thanks. RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 13:58:20.691 : test_trap[65889]: Debug init Done RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 13:58:21.083 : test_trap[446]: Trap ID: 28 RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 13:58:21.084 : test_trap[446]: make_test_traps: input args 0x0 0x0 (null) (null) Failed to format BGP Trap RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 13:58:21.084 : test_trap[446]: get_first_bgp_peer_index: Getting first BGP Peer RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:Feb 22 13:58:21.104 : test_trap[446]: get_first_bgp_peer_index: Failed to get BGP indices Current config: snmp-server host x.x.x.x traps version 2c xxxxxx snmp-server community encrypted xxxx RO snmp-server community encrypted yyyy RW snmp-server traps rf snmp-server traps bgp cbgp2 snmp-server traps bgp snmp-server traps ospf state-change neighbor-state-change snmp-server packetsize 1024 snmp-server trap-source MgmtEth0/RSP0/CPU0/0 snmp-server ifindex persist Regards. Leo
... View more
Labels:
02-18-2013
12:17 PM
Hi Tim, It's 1 cpu, 2G ram, 80G disk, what is the requirement for the VM? During the installation, it did show me a message said 'this is a vmware environment, it will be supported by TAC etc' Is this normail? Thanks, Leo
... View more
02-17-2013
06:15 PM
I installed a CUCM 7.1 on VM host and I can SSH into it, but can't open the admin web page. When I tried the https://x.x.x.x/ccmadmin , I got following message. The Cisco Tomcat service is running on the server and I had tried to restart the service and the whole VM host, but still no luck. Any suggestions? Your request could not be completed. Please review the web server logs for more details. Home Thanks. Leo
... View more
Labels:
02-03-2013
02:07 PM
Hi guys, I have been readying a few documents about VPLS/EoMPLS but still confuse about the bridge-domain and xconnect. Could you please provide any ideas which scenarios I should use bridge-domain and which should be for xconnect? What is the difference between them, any documens can explain this? Thanks, Leo
... View more
Labels:
01-17-2013
02:24 PM
Cesar, Following command fixed my issue, but seems yours is different since you have one PVDM on NM module. As Chris suggest, you may need to remvoe the PVDM from NM module then give it a try. Conf t voice-card X dspfarm dsp services dspfarm Cheers, Leo
... View more
11-27-2012
04:42 PM
Hi, we have CUCM 7.1 and router 3845 here and now only has one ISDN connected. The router has 4 PVMD2-64 and 2 E1 ports, it has been configured as conference bridge and registerd in the CUCM. Now we are planning to have another one ISDN, my question is if we need to shut down the conference bridge before bringing up the other one E1 port and pri-group? Does it have any impact to existing production service? Will the router assign the DSP resource automatically? Thanks. Leo
... View more
Labels:
10-18-2012
04:07 PM
Hi, we are using ACS 5.1.0.44.3 to do the AAA for ASR 9K. Now we want to add the cisco-support group for the network administrator so that they can have highest privilege to run some commands to troubleshoot. Cisco suggested us to add following config on ACS, but it didn't work. Anyone has any ideas? Under the shell profile, in cutom attributes tag, add new attribute Attribute: task Requirement: optional Value: #cisco-support Thanks. Leo
... View more
Labels:
Created by
xzjleo2005
in XR OS and Platforms
in XR OS and Platforms
09-11-2012
08:09 PM
09-11-2012
08:09 PM
Hi Alex, sorry to bother, I am trying to add the 'cisco-support' in TACACS for everyone.We are running ACS 5.1.0.44.3, but I couldn't find any documents show how to do that. Could you please help confirm if my following steps are correct? Should the requirement be the mandatory? Where can I find any doc can explain the value setting? Thanks. In ACS GUI, Policy Elements -> Authorization and Permissions -> Device Administration -> Shell Profiles -> View: "Shell Profile Priv. Level 15'' -> Go to Custom Attributes tag Attribute: Cisco support Requirement: Mandatory Value: task="# root-system, # cisco-support" Regards, Leo
... View more
Public Statistics
| Date Registered | 02-16-2006 05:10 AM |
| Date Last Visited | 09-16-2018 05:19 PM |
| Total Messages Posted | 149 |
| Total Helpful Votes Received | 10 |
Helpful Votes Given To
| User | Helpful Count |
|---|---|
| 2 | |
| 5 | |
| 10 | |
| 4 | |
| 2 |
.jpg "VIP Mentor"){kind=icon}
.jpg "Hall of Fame Community Legend"){kind=icon}
