About jmecklenburg

jmecklenburg · 07-26-2022

Hi Guys. I need to know how to calculate the seizing for the interfaces in a C9800, for example if I have a c9800 in central switching whit 1Gbps uplink for 20 AP an 100 user i'm fine but if I have 200 AP whit 1000 users the requieremnt for the inter...

jmecklenburg · 05-18-2022

Hi I have wlc9800 pair in HA mode.. in RP mode not at RP+RMI mode the chasis 2 have a priority 2 and the chasis 1 have a priority 1, and I want the chasis 2 works as my primary, is in myy primary site...in the documentation the higest number have the...

jmecklenburg · 09-06-2021

Hi Team.. In a 9800 controller if I look the client statitics in the tab Mobility History I have the value "Run Latency" in ms What's Run Lantency means... I tested the connection from the wlc and the cliente to the default gateway and I have values ...

jmecklenburg · 01-07-2021

Hi Team I´m thinking about a small DCI, we need like 40x 10G interfaces and 100G trunk interface, but I don´t know nothing about it.. for the client side I have SFP 10G interfaces... I´m looking the NSC 1001 or 1002 but I don't know if I need just a ...

add user diferent domain · 06-15-2020

Hi What happen if to my organizacion add user from other domains, can I do this? What happen with this account? Regards

jmecklenburg · 07-28-2022

Right now I have one c9800 with a port-channel LACP with 2Gbps BW the average is over 500Mbps in one interface and 200Mbps in other so I need to knowif they any math fot the interfaces.. but apparentli is not.

jmecklenburg · 07-26-2022

I understand, but I think should be a best practice or recommendation to calculate the bandwidth in different scenario.

jmecklenburg · 05-18-2022

The failover test works fine, when are using 17.3.5c, and no when the RP goes down, both controller goes as active as expected. Attach some log from standby when the RP goes down take control as active and then force the switchover. Regards.

jmecklenburg · 05-18-2022

I'm aware to the N+1, just I want to know if the behavior it's OK. Because if both take the active role and the RP connectivity is recovered the chassis that have to reload should be the priority 1 not the 2. Thanks

jmecklenburg · 07-22-2020

We have the same problem here, macbook pro mid 2014 and Webex use the 99% CPU.I have the last webex client version. 40.7.2.15

Member Since	‎11-16-2006 10:25 AM
Date Last Visited	‎08-24-2022 12:01 AM
Posts	236
Total Helpful Votes Received	5

User Statistics

User Activity

9800 interface seizing

9800 HA RP recovery

Run Latency - 9800 Mobility History

Small DWDM Question

add user diferent domain

Re: 9800 interface seizing

Re: 9800 interface seizing

Re: 9800 HA RP recovery

Re: 9800 HA RP recovery

Re: High CPU usage with Webex Teams on Mac