Hello,I wonder if someone has a working ISDN2 (basic-net3) config they can share for point to multipoint (ideally in the UK).I have always had ISDN2 circuits presented as point to point with a single BRI circuit (2 channels, one physical presentation...
Hello,I am trying to get some 3rd party devices (gigaset DECT gateway 192.168.0.22) to register to a CME (192.168.0.79) box.I have 3 x extensions configured on the Gigaset but I am getting SIP errors :-000226: Sep 23 18:00:36.779: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/S...
Hi,I use a transformation pattern applied outbound to calls through my gateway which works fine for calls made directly from the phone extension. However when a call is forwarded using a CFA the Transformation Pattern is not being applied at the gate...
Hi,Directory is synced to AD. When we built this off site in our lab we created a couple of test users. Now we are on site we have synced to AD and when we search the AD from a phone the test user still appears. When we search in CUCM End Users the u...
Hi,This is a new install of CUCM9.1 with SIP trunks on a CUBE (Version 15.2(4)M2). The CUBE is behind an ASA and a PIX. The ASA is the corporate perimeter and the PIX is the client site.Outbound I get a 403 forbidden then fast busy. We are sending th...
Hi Paolo,Thanks for the response. As this is Layer 2 I didnt think MGCP was the culprit. Also, TAC insisted we had to remove static-tei 0 from the config because both BRI circuits were using TEI=0 on the same NTE. When we remove isdn static-tei 0 the...
No problem Carlo.Thanks for looking.I'm uploading a sh run, and three screenshots from the Gigaset, one of the VoIP provider where we configure the CME details & a couple of pages for the actual handsets.
Hi Carlo,I removed the type ata, recreated profiles, reset the gigaset and still get the same errors :-000102: Sep 23 19:33:51.807: //-1/xxxxxxxxxxxx/SIP/Msg/ccsipDisplayMsg:Received:REGISTER sip:192.168.0.79 SIP/2.0Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.22:506...
HiI have transformation patterns for every internal extension and the transformation CSS selected on the gateway - this has been succesfully transforming the calling party for 8 weeks so works well. The issue comes when we do a CFA and the number doe...
Hi chaps,I am working on this with TAC. We have changed the calling party selection but still the internal DN is presented in the Q931n setup to the telco. TAC think this is a bug in 9.1.1.20000-5.I'll confirm back with any further findings.ThanksPau...
