Is there any performance issues with redirecting wccp 62 on an SVI of the 6500 series switch? The WAN interfaces are not layer 3 but are associated with a vlan that has an SVI configured. I will be using redirect lists for interception. Regards,
... View more
Based on Cisco's SRND for WAAS, WCCP is not VRF-aware. At the time of this writing, WCCP is not VRF-aware. Subsequently, VRF tunnels should not be configured on any routers with direct interfaces to the WAE. MPLS tunneling should work provided that the WAEs are deployed outside of the network tunnels. VRF support for WCCP is expected for WCCP v3.0, tentatively scheduled for release later this year. http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns477/c649/ccmigration_09186a008081c7d5.pdf HTH
... View more
Per you drawing, this behaviour is OK since you have layer 2 links between the MRUCOLOPRODSW1 switch and MRUMADCORPSW1 switch. Try sourcing your trace from your vlan 24 interface on switch MRUCOLOPRODSW1. This trace should go through MRUCOLOCORPSW1.
... View more
A customer of mine is currently dual homed to one single provider with multiple local routers. We are load sharing using local preference in BGP. I was reading about Optimized Edge Routing (PfR) and would like to solicit some input regarding this technology. From what I have gathered with OER, you must define a master controller and define policies for your application traffic. If your traffic remains within the policies, you will utilize the best path detrmined by the routing protocol. If your traffic falls out of policy, the master controller will inject routes or PBR entries to utilize the secondary link until all traffic falls back within the defined policy. Depending on your traffic patterns and your defined policies, the primary link could be used 100% of the time with the secondary link being idle if all traffic falls within the policies. I understand that this may work well for real time applications like voice and video but I do not see the benefit for my customer. With the current setup, we are utilizing both links all the time. Has anyone deployed this technology and can you provide some benefits it has over other traditional load sharing techniques? Regards
... View more
I would use a nested policy map. You can first shape all traffic to 10 mbps and then apply your priority statement to voice traffic. More info regarding this solution is located in the link below. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios124/124cg/hqos_c/part40/qctmcli2.htm#wp1060235 Regards
... View more
We are trying to migrate from a Windows NT server running ACS 2.6 to an ACS appliance. The users on the Windows NT box are local only and not part of the current AD domain. We would like to import all users including the ones from the Windows NT database into the ACS then migrate to the ACS appliance.
... View more
Hello, A client of mine is currently running ACS 2.6 on a Windows NT server. They have configured the Unknow User Policy to check the local Windows Database for any users that are not found in the ACS internal database. Is there any way to import their password from the Windows external database to the ACS internal database? What I have read below seems to tell me that this is not possible. CiscoSecure ACS does not import passwords for a discovered user; rather, CiscoSecure ACS creates the user account with the Password Authentication list set to the external user database that originally authenticated the user. I know another option is to use the RDBMS Synchronization but it looks to me like if I were to add the password I would need to add it manually for each user. Regards
... View more
This is a Shoretel phone system so it would be tough to match the protocol if Cisco is unaware or does not have their protocol in NBAR. I would reference the Shoretel docs to find out which udp ports they use for voice. Then I would use an access-list to define the traffic. Or if the IP phones mark the traffic, I would configure on your edge switches mls qos trust cos and apply the appropriate COS-DSCP mapping. As a side note, since you are utilizing PPP multilink I would suggest implementing the following commands to the configuration as well. Under the multilink int R1(config-if)#ppp multilink fragment delay 10 R1(config-if)#ppp multilink interleave Regards
... View more
Another option would be to use SRR queue on the 3750. It requires quite a bit of configuration but essentially you can mark the traffic with a certain DSCP value. Then attach that DSCP value to a queue (3750's have 4 outbound queues). Then you can shape the traffic per interface by each queue. More information is below in the attached link. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3750/12235se/scg/swqos.htm#wp1162303
... View more
Check out the link below. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/netsol/ns504/networking_solutions_program_category_home.html Safe Harbor focuses on satisfying customer quality requirements in key vertical markets. This program links and expands on several Cisco testing projects, including development, regression testing, and systems testing critical to the success of enterprise-service organizations. Safe Harbor certification marks the successful completion of extensive integrity testing that validates each release. Regards
... View more
I would apply policing to discard that traffic. First define an ACL that permits all ip traffic from that specific machine. access-list 101 permit ip x.x.x.x 0.0.0.0 (host machine) any next define a class-map that identifies the ACL we did previously. class-map POLICE_TRAFFIC match access group 101 then define the policy-map to police that traffic. policy-map POLICE class POLICE_TRAFFIC police x (threshold were if traffic exceeds x it will be dropped) then apply the policy map to the outgoing interface. service-policy POLICE out More information on policing is on the link below. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fqos_c/fqcprt4/qcfpoli.htm HTH
... View more
Check to make sure the speed and duplex is set correctly on both devices. Your e0 interface is probably a 10Mb half-duplex connection. Your other device may be trying to transmit at 100Mb full-duplex. If you have to, I would hard code the speed and duplex on both devices. Regards
... View more
Is your DHCP server going to be on this switch? If so, can put that server's switchport on a different vlan? Then you can use the ip helper-address command and forward DHCP requests to that server. http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/lan/cat3560/12225see/scg/swipaddr.htm
... View more