Hi Georg Thanks for that link which is really helpful. I have attached a picture as a reference. I see BFD standard feature is there but not sure why I don't see that option. ... View more

Hi Georg Thanks for replying.  I tried both. Under bgp I tried " neighbor x.x.x.x fall-over bfd" didn't work, and then I tried the same command under particular address family still the switch didn't like the keyword "fall-over".   Regards MC ... View more

Hi Saurabh I have a Catalyst 6509 switch running on code Version 12.2(18)SXF11. I have BGP running on this switch with my carrier. I would like to configure BFD under BGP but I see " fall-over  bfd" option is not available when I do "neighbor x.x.x.x fall-over bfd". However, I was able to configure bfd internal on my interface and show bfp neigh command just works(no output though).   Can you pls help me how to configure bfd under BGP on this switch?   thank you MC   ... View more

I had the same Issue and I did the following to fix it. Router(3845)(config)#no ip nat outside source static x.x.x.x y.y.y.y Static entry in use, do you want to delete child entries? [no]: yes <<------ I said Yes. After Investigation, In my case I found that one user was still connected to the server reason why it was showing the static entry in use. As soon as I deleted the child entries and did "clear ip nat translation * " it resolved my Issue. Note:  clear IP nat translation* has no impact to the production and If you delete child entries it will delete the open session on different ports for that particular static mapping only. It will not impact others. HTH for someone who may have similar issue in future. Regards Mohammad  ... View more

@Marius, Thank you for the command/solution. It resolved my problem today. ... View more