About MachadoGB

MachadoGB · 08-24-2011

Hello,I have a question about configuring two GETVPN groups in the same Group Member device.Scenario: CE router running BGP connected to PE router on MPLS provider. CE router is running GETVPN on group 123. User asking to create a separate VPN enviro...

MachadoGB · 08-17-2011

I am trying to trust the marking for voice traffic in a Cisco 4948E interface/port and it looks like the "qos" command is not working as described in the command reference.Is there any particular way to configure a port to trust the QoS marking rece...

MachadoGB · 05-13-2011

I am using EIGRP and BGP redistribution into each other protocols.It is working as designed.But I am facing a routing issue:- I have some remote sites using static routes on point to point links. the static routes point's to the remote LAN subnets.- ...

MachadoGB · 04-27-2011

HelloI have a design question about BGP. I have two EBGP peers from backbone to one remote site with two routers, so each remote router is connected to one Backbone router via point-to-point link (all /30 ip networks). Between the two backbone router...

MachadoGB · 04-25-2011

Hello, I need help to understand an odd situation.I have 4 BGP connections to a provider (multi-homed environment). This is MPLS-VPN not Internet. The provider is allowing multi-path for the EBGP peer. My AS is 65000 and the provider’s AS is 123. My ...

MachadoGB · 09-02-2011

Hi Collin,I do have that document but it is really missing information when it comes to multiple groups. I guess Cisco has to review that.I was able to configure and test the multiple group. It works fine.So I appreciate your help.Thanks.

MachadoGB · 08-30-2011

Hi Sherrikhan,I did apply your condition to my LAB - at least some of it.and:1 - Yes - when you fail the primary to secondary KS, the IP address for the Priamry stays in the output of show crypto isakmp sa and on others until the re-register time ex...

MachadoGB · 08-24-2011

Hi Edison,You are correct about the MQC and the trust behavior of the 4948E. I will use the MQC and apply the policy I need.But what still bugging me is the fact hat the 4948E I have only accepts the "qos control-packets" command instead of the norm...

MachadoGB · 06-13-2011

Well, The VAM2+ card is the recommended for GETVPN running on 7200 routers as Key servers or Group Members. Considering the reliability I would stick with it. Also pay attentionon the memory fo the Key servers it is better to use the maximum ( 256MB...

MachadoGB · 05-23-2011

Today I did some tests and came up with the following:- the remote site is up and running all the remote sites subnetwokrs are well know via EIGRP to the 7200 routers A & B.- the subnetworks from remote site are removed from EIGRP routing process bec...

Member Since	‎08-30-2006 09:10 AM
Date Last Visited	‎08-18-2017 03:54 AM
Posts	49

User Statistics

User Activity

GETVPN - Two Groups in the same GM

QoS Turst for Cisco 4948E switch

EIGRP and BGP routing

BGP Loadsharing not happening

Influencing BGP routes with MPLS provider

Re: GETVPN - Two Groups in the same GM

GETVPN KS Question

QoS Turst for Cisco 4948E switch

Can the 7201 support GETVPN without a VAM?

Re: EIGRP and BGP routing