Hi all,
I am looking for a feature in Cisco switches, which allows coupling interfaces (physical ports) to be bound together, such that a change in the link state of one interface, will result in the same change on the other interface.
For example:
...
Hi all,
I have the following setup:
:
Where Host 1 is a multicast traffic source, and Host 2 is a multicast traffic client. IGMP snooping is configured on both switches. Host 2 boots and sends an...
I have a setup similar to this one:
Where "Host 1" and "Host 2" are two machines that communicate with each other using multicast\broadcast traffic. The machines are connected to each other via two switch...
Hi,
I tried the second option (configuring IGMP snooping querier), and it worked for some time, but then the querier timer expired and the multicast traffic stopped again.
is there any way to disable the timeout for the querier? did i do something w...
Thanks for the answer.
I have a little question, though: what happens in situations were both hosts are multicast server and client, for example in routers running routing protocols such as OSPF, in which multicast messages are sent and received by a...
of course it should, but fact is that SW1 forwards it to SW2 only once, and then starts answering host 1's queries with a proxy reports. This is not specific to my setup,I saw it happening on other setups as well. Seems like some optimization the swi...
Hi,
Host 1 sends both the multicast traffic and the IGMP queries, i.e. it is both the mrouter and the multicast traffic source. to my understanding, this should not affect the switch behavior.
Thanks,
Omer.
