Ok, I think I’m getting there.So, this wouldn’t have happened if I’d have put the WAN as last in my list. Which I think I’m doing to solve the problem. What I don’t get is: if my wan is /30 shouldn’t I have only 4 more IPs (in this case until .99)? A...

If IP on Gi0/0/0 170.70.70.101/27 (which is first IP available to use) isn't network address 170.70.70.100?Every 32 IP I should have a subnet but, what if I have a different mask as /30, then I'd have only 4 IPs, right?As I have written here:Is it ma...

I don't get it, where in this table should I use a /24? What I understand is /24 gives me 256 IPs available and I don't need that many for none of my switches. Can you explain a little bit more in detail?I'm using this table:

I don't understand, why would it overlap if 170.70.70.101/27 goes from 170.70.70.100 to 170.70.70.131, doesn't have 170.70.70.96 on it, right?And also, IPs before these are 170.70.70.64/27 which goes to 170.70.70.95.The IPs I'm using for the WAN (Rou...