Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi Cisco Support Community.I posted earlier about this but have not found resolution. However, I have learned some more about the problem.Here is a portion of the network.On switch gc2960, we want to have clients on vlan 29 and vlan 27. We are connec...
Cisco Support Community,I hope I am articulating this problem correctly:We have a switch gc2960. It has ports configured on vlan 27 and vlan 29.It is connected to switch ch3550. It has presence of vlan 27 vlan 29 and also vlan 18 and several other vl...
Hi Cisco Community,On my 2960, 3550, and 2801 equipment which all have IOS 12.2 or 12.3 I am able to obtain things like "show tech" and save it on a tftp server in this manner:ch3550#show tech | redirect tftp://192.168.18.18/techsupport.txtThis is be...
Hi CSC,This is more of a philosophical or "best practices" question.I have a Cisco 3550 at the home office. Connected to the 3550 is a number of branch offices by way of T1 circuits or VDSL modems. They all come to the home office, where we have a ce...
Hi there,I wish to create an ethernet bridge between different network segments on the same subnet over t1.I am replacing two adtran ta850's with two cisco 2801, each router has wic-1dsu-t1-v2 installed, to communicate over a telco t1 from Qwest.We n...
I have discovered the reason for the trouble I was having, this was not related to mtu or switch configuration.We were connected from site to site over T1, using Adtran Total Access 850 units at both locations. Apparently these units do not pass 802....
Wow! Excellent idea!system mtu routing 1500 is set on both switches.I can from the client pc on vlan 29 on switch gc2960 send packets up to 1472 bytes when native vlan is set to vlan 29 on the trunk port. More, and we receive an error that the packet...
Glen,Originally, I had the gc2960 connected to the ch3750 unit shown on the extreme left of the diagram as trunking. I moved it to f0/5 on the 3550, thinking we had too many switch hops or spanning-tree issues. The problem persisted.But... That's ...
duh. just noriced switchport access vlan 29. maybe taking that out will help for vlan 27 traffic. Will advise, but need to drive out to the site to check.But... why do we need to do native vlan 29 anyway? I would think it would work without it.
