About j.hoffmann

j.hoffmann · 08-05-2020

I have a question related to the attached scratch. It's my intention to transport all VLANs (which are part of a dot1q-trunk) from the lefthand side to the righthand side and vice versa. The outer VLAN has only local relevance between the switch acce...

j.hoffmann · 09-29-2019

Hi colleagues, I have some strange problems to configure a multihome topology on the edge of a PBB-EVPN infrastructure.PBB-EVPN allows in contrast to VPLS and PW an all-active topology, which means all memberlinks of the MC-LAG distributed over multi...

j.hoffmann · 09-12-2019

ASR903 / RSP3 / IOS-XE 03.18.05.SP.156-2.SP5-ext Hi community members,I have a problem as follows. On a "normal" physical 10GE interface I have configured a parent egress policy which traffic-classes matchingon different service instances.I achieve a...

j.hoffmann · 08-16-2019

Hi, I have a problem in my small PBB-EVPN lab installation.Two PE routers (ASR9904) are directly connected via a 100GE link. On these two routers, a full and correct operating PBB-EVPN configuration is implemented.The ingress ports on the access side...

j.hoffmann · 07-21-2019

Hi,it is my intention to trust incoming COS values on the UNI Ingress of an ASR903 (RSP3, IOS 3.18.05.SP.156-2.SP5 ). On the UNI port, a service instance ethernet with an associated bridge domain is configured. DSCP is not analyzable in this setup.In...

j.hoffmann · 08-05-2020

I have tested this setup in CML and confirmed that "second-dot1q..." is mandatory to transport the VLAN trunk (including the outer VLAN). Transport without the outer VLAN seems to be impossible with this setup.

j.hoffmann · 12-05-2019

Hi pigallo, you wrote "mode singleton and iccp neighborship cannot be used together". But how about this config example from a Cisco config guide?

j.hoffmann · 08-23-2019

Hello Giuseppe,in the current configuration, all incoming VLAN-tags are popped off on ingress. Ingress-PE:#########################################################################Ingress-Port============interface TenGigE0/0/0/5cdpservice-policy inpu...

j.hoffmann · 08-19-2019

A little supplement to be more precise: The ingress policy receiving MPLS labeled packets indicates the correct labeled traffic in each class.The classification counters increases and the bandwidth usage in each class is correct, and the configured ...

j.hoffmann · 02-22-2019

I'm not sure if I have overlooked something.... But what is the right config to use more the two POA => Multi-homed device instead of dual-homed device? With the singleton CLI command, it is no more necessary to configure the ICCP neighbor explicit. ...

Member Since	‎09-25-2005 02:34 AM
Date Last Visited	‎04-01-2021 05:41 PM
Posts	26

User Statistics

User Activity

VLAN trunk via L2TPv3 tunnel

Multihomed Device with MC-LAG on the PBB-EVPN Edge (AApF-LB)

Egress QoS configuration on Etherchannel

Classification based on MPLS EXP on egress

COS Downmarking on ASR903

Re: VLAN trunk via L2TPv3 tunnel

Re: Multihomed Device with MC-LAG on the PBB-EVPN Edge (AApF-LB)

Re: Classification based on MPLS EXP on egress

Re: Classification based on MPLS EXP on egress

Re: ASR9000/XR: Multichassis LAG or MC-LAG (MCLAG) guide