I'm was hoping to receive some help within this community and not be slapped and forwarded to your SBSC dept who then chooses to ask me to pull out my wallet in order to troubleshoot, for Cisco, a bug with their own IOS on this particular box. This is asking a bit too much. This is not the only bug I see with these SB routers, perhaps someone there should open up a considerable amount of funding to fix these pesty bugs instead of waiting for a next firmware release. On this particular router the release version of 184.108.40.206 is from 2015. I've seen enough complaints on this particular router which should warrant a more competitive firmware update program, not much to say for keeping your long existing customers very happy, over 25yrs..
Now you do realize that a firewall not being able to reorder access rules for "deny" is useless as a firewall. As you see any new deny or existing rule(s) cannot be reordered to the beginning where most deny statements should be, especially connected to the internet these days.
Not a very happy camper.. Jim
... View more
Hi res-kompresor , I have experienced this behaviour with other Small Biz VPN routers and I resolved it by deleting all VPN configurations and starting fresh with new configurations when changing your WAN static IP.
I had tried to repair the broken VPN but this was the only method that worked for me in the end.
... View more
Hi, I've been using a few of the RV180s for a few years and have had some issues in the past which were resolved a couple of years back by upgrading the firmware to the latest 220.127.116.11 with PID V01. I have used up all possible Access Rules (100) in the past and have deleted some unwanted rules but now when I try to move/reorder a Deny Access Rule it generates and error on save "Firewall configuration has failed". I have also tried deselecting the the rule before hitting save and I get another error "i18nHTMLMissing". I can move Access Rules with Allow.
I cleared all logging and tested the reorder again and same issue. Turned on debugging and all logging and noticed this under information
Wed Apr 12 07:18:01 2017(GMT-0500) [rv180][Kernel][KERNEL] [209726.040000] Clearing the ISR c0941d40 Wed Apr 12 07:18:01 2017(GMT-0500) [rv180][Kernel][KERNEL] [209726.040000] Clearing the ISR c0941800
This is the only thing that would come close to logging anything for this error. All other logs are empty, I am running iPsec which is up and running.
All other firewall rules seem to behave in the normal fashion, except for the odd time rules do not seem to apply immediately and sometimes takes a few minutes to a couple of hours for the actual rule to become active, other times rules work immediately.
I am able to duplicate this problem on my other RV180s, only after the firewall rules reached its limit of 100 and reduced the number to by half or by uploading the configuration into another RV180. I have also tried reflashing the firmware on them and the same error persists.
Any help would be appreciated, very frustrating when trying to deny netblock attacks from lets say Vietnam or Poland.
... View more
Hi, We are currently using the RV180 to NAT hosting VM servers on various platforms. DNAT seems to be working fine but in setting up a NAT out does not. scenario: Internal IPs : 10.1.1.x/24 WAN NIC : 18.104.22.168/24 VMs : 10.1.1.x/24 Main VM Host : 10.1.1.35 (vSwitch01) on NIC001 WinSrv 2008 : 10.1.1.32 WinSrv 2015 : 10.1.1.29 CentOS : 10.1.1.99 Public IPs : 64.111.111.x/24 (ie.) DNAT : 10.1.1.99 ---> 22.214.171.124 DNAT : 10.1.1.32 ---> 126.96.36.199 DNAT : 10.1.1.29 ---> 188.8.131.52 All outbound traffic is being tagged as 184.108.40.206. How can we set a static outbound NAT from internal IP to External? The RV180 does not appear to have a selection of SNAT like what is shown in the documents for setting this up. Software Firmware version: 220.127.116.11 For the purpose of licensing software and SMTP traffic we need to have the proper IP NATing from the local IP to the assigned to it's paired public IP address. __ Jim Evans ICT Tech Support
... View more