Hi,
I am evaluating alternatives to the existing attendant console which we are using now in the European area.
As usual the attendant console is most of the time part of a host of extra tools (Telephone book, reverse lookups, reporting) so any p...
Hi,
I am looking for some information what the real caveats are when I enable encryption between the Callmanager and Phones. The information I can find is pretty old and leads me to suspect that it is not widely used because of some unknown reason.
...
Hi,I installed a new 3rd party (and valid) certificate on the Expressway for MRA. Now the Windows Jabber clients still give a "certificate invalid" warning when they login. If you ignore the pop-up you still can log in and no host certificate will be...
Hi, I want to sign an Expressway-E CSR with a public CA. As per Cisco (and other) documentation and guides my current CSR has 5 SANs (Subject Alternative Names. My customer is currently using GoDaddy which happily throws away the requested SANs and r...
Hi,Because of a name change I would like to update the O= parameter in the CUCM certificates. The O= is also automatically used when generating a CSR. Is there a way to change this without reinstalling the Callmanager?As this would affect all generat...
- Cost effective high availability. For example, if I would need a MS SQL cluster as a back end then I would not call that cost effective because the MS licenses are pretty expensive.
- Multi tenant support.
- Basic IVR support.
- Maybe even ti...
I had a problem with GoDaddy because they didn't allow a "duplicate" FWDN (CN + SAN). Which is strange because it is the usual way to insure backwards compatibility which checking for names inside the certificate.I should note that the FQDN of the se...
Good point, as I was more interested in the CAPF certificates I didn't expect this feature to be located under web-security. This also (unfortunately) shows that the Cisco development engineers kind of ignore the possibility to sign the CAPF certs a...
Last >15.000 cluster I did was on a UCS. I chose the 7500 user per node template because it will only cost you 2 cores compared to the 10.000 user per node which will set you back to 4 cores per VM. The difference is either 2 VMs per B-blade or 4 VMs...
