About blakeaa827

blakeaa827 · 12-10-2010

Hello all,I've got a bit of a problem, and I'm hoping someone else has some experience with this. My client uses a metro ethernet solution to connect to local branches. The metro ethernet circuit is delivered on a Gigabit interface. However, the i...

blakeaa827 · 04-06-2010

Hello all,This is my first post here, and hopefully it's pretty simple. I believe this should be straight forward, but I find myself confused after reading CCIE R&S Exam Cert Guide, 4th ed.On page 476, under "Step 10: Lowest Neighbor ID", the book s...

blakeaa827 · 12-11-2010

Hello Lei,I agree the shaper would become active more often, but I would also think that it shouldn't stay active as long. Which I'm hoping will shorten my queue lengths. It's still frustrating that it's activating when the interface is pushing les...

blakeaa827 · 12-11-2010

Here is where I think the problem lies. The shaper is active when the throughput is less than 10% of the target shape... GigabitEthernet0/0/0.75 Service-policy output: shape-10meg Class-map: class-default (match-any) 2697195 packets, 63476...

blakeaa827 · 12-11-2010

Hello HTH,I don't believe LLQ will help. WRED only randomly drops packets that are queued. LLC doesn't have a queue at all. So it's more like strict tail drop. I believe even more packets would get lost. Priority queueing is really designed for ...

blakeaa827 · 12-10-2010

Hello Lei,Thank you very much for the reply. I do believe that is what's happening. I think the shaper is becoming active way too soon. I considered changing the wred thresholds to higher values, but if I can keep the packets from being queued at ...

blakeaa827 · 12-10-2010

I don't know you. You don't know me. So lets set comparisons about our experience aside. When someone asks a technical question about a technology, especially a technology expressly recommended by Cisco in a specific situation, the response should...

Member Since	‎04-06-2010 08:25 AM
Date Last Visited	‎08-18-2017 03:56 AM
Posts	13

User Statistics

User Activity

Shaping to a very small percentage of interface rate

BGP decision process

Re: Shaping to a very small percentage of interface rate

Re: Shaping to a very small percentage of interface rate

Re: Shaping to a very small percentage of interface rate

Re: Shaping to a very small percentage of interface rate

Re: Shaping to a very small percentage of interface rate