Hi.
I have a router running IOS-XE terminating a 300Mbps transatlantic WAN link.
I have written the following policy to be applied to the outgoing interface facing the WAN:
policy-map 300MBPS-SHAPER class class-default shape average 300000000 ...
Hi,Have set up a simple VPC arrangement between two Nexus 7ks, offering a vpc down to a 3750 switch.I was sort of expecting the 3750 switch end to be spanning tree forwarding on both of it's port-channel's member ports, but it's actually blocking on ...
Hi,I've been working on some tweaks to our BGP setup, and wondered if anyone else could confirm some behaviour I've noticed.When using the aggregate-address command with a suppress-map, it would seem that if you match prefixes to be suppressed using ...
Good question - I thought the outer policy map being shaped to 300M meant the inner policy map parameters worked within the confines of 300M, is that not how it works?
Not sure if this answers the DF-bit question, but this blog post (from a few years ago) covers off all fragmentation/MTU/DF variations I could think of https://sites.google.com/view/fieldnoted/fragments-mtu-and-gre
Hope it helps.
Hi Steve, thanks for replying:37503750#sh eth summ Flags: D - down P - bundled in port-channel I - stand-alone s - suspended H - Hot-standby (LACP only) R - Layer3 S - Layer2 U - in use f - failed to al...
Hi, thanks for replying, was just about to delete discussion as this was user (me) error.Both access-list and prefix-list work fine as the matching criteria for the suppress-map.Also prefixes matched by the suppress-map do get marked with "s" in the ...
