After adding a A9K-4X100GE to an ASR, and shifting traffic to a bundle on this line card, vrf traffic fails. Initially I suspected licensing per LC issue, but nothing shows on logs after rerouting is committed to go through new LC bundle.   Any comments or thoughts appreciated !  ... View more

Dear all,   When leaking between vrf and Global "import from default-vrf & advertise-as-vpn", does the vrf definition needs to be reapplied for new changes to take effect ? I think not, however I am seeing an issue on 5.3.4, where changing CEF NH kills the leaking.        I parsed documented bugs, and see issues close to what I see but close enough to conclude. Any thoughts or comments appreciated !   TIA  ... View more

I am experiencing something similar to CSCut04689, where by imported prefix fails to be advertised to vrf when route to BGP next hop for the prefix changes. For example prefix 10.1.1.1/32 is leaked from Global to vrf A, and 10.1.1.1/32 is know via BGP with its NH reachable via 192.168.10.1 in global. When I make a routing change (IGP metric), so that BGP NH is reachable via 192.168.20.1, then 10.1.1.1/32 is no longer leaked to vrf.   Workaround I plan to test is to reapply the vrf definition with its import export policies, without actually removing it. As well as clear route in global....then trace labels.   This issue is seen on ASR9010 running 5.3.4   Anyone seen similar issues or has good suggestions ?   Thanks in advance !   /Sam       ... View more

I configured following setup: PE: I match outer tag and POP it, then Xconnect to BNG. BNG: PWHE is used for termination, at present no BNG dynamic profile is uses, just a simple subif.   Issue is, PWHE is up, but not sending any traffic, only receiving.   PE: interface Bundle-Ether50.50 l2transport encapsulation dot1q 50 second-dot1q any rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric mtu 9000   BNG: interface PW-Ether50 mtu 8996 mac-address 50.50.50 load-interval 30 attach generic-interface-list TEST_50 ! interface PW-Ether50.50 encapsulation ambiguous dot1q any second-dot1q 10 ! !!l2vpn config is same on both sides apart from remote loopback IPs:   pw-class PWHE encapsulation mpls transport-mode ethernet ! ! xconnect group PWHE p2p PWHE50 interface Bundle-Ether50.50 neighbor ipv4 192.168.1.2 pw-id 30150 pw-class PWHE     RP/0/RSP0/CPU0:lab1#sh l2vpn xconnect pw-id 30150 detail | i packets Thu Jun 7 11:49:21.549 CETDST packets: received 21, sent 0 packets: received 21, sent 0   Anyone tested similar setup or aware of limitations when tags are manipulated ? Simple dot1q BEs work fine with PWHE.   TIA   /Sam ... View more