About mike-stevenson

mike-stevenson · 10-29-2014

Hi,I have an ASR9001 running 5.1.3. is it possible to configure an interface using "encapsulation ambiguous dot1q any second any" , and have DHCP requests forwarded to a DHCP server.I have a need where I have a large number of DHCP clients that do n...

mike-stevenson · 03-02-2014

Hi,reading through the config guides, I see that there is documentation that shows redistribution of statics, connected, and various routing protocols (am look at specifically ospf, and BGP).Is redistributing subscriber into a routing protocol a supp...

mike-stevenson · 01-12-2014

Hi,I have two VRFs, lets call them internet, and customers_1.PPPoE, and IPoE subscribers terminate in the customers_1 VRF, I am wanting to leak these addresses into the internet vrf.I have configured the relevant import and export statements, and see...

mike-stevenson · 12-28-2013

Hi,I have setup a psuedo-wire between a port on a me3600-x to an ASR91K, the frames received on at the me3600 are QinQ (eg 101,25) these frames are then forwarded via a xconnect to an ASR91K where I drop them out onto an interface (which I then 'han...

mike-stevenson · 11-21-2013

Hi,can some one tell me if this is possible.I have a bundle Interface -using ambiguous VLANS:interface Bundle-Ether100.1 vrf customers_1 ipv4 unnumbered lo2 ipv4 point-to-point arp learning disable service-policy type control subscriber UFB_DHCP ipsu...

mike-stevenson · 10-18-2015

Hi Peter,yes we had major problems with this, ended up falling back to using a handbag interface (i.e. ethernet looped between interfaces) our SR was SR 635645739 this lead to CSCuv71988. cheers

mike-stevenson · 10-16-2015

Hmm I don't suppose you would be having issues with PWHE and IPoE subscribers.. not getting arp responses to requests for the cpe default gateway after the subscriber session comes up? been there.. good luck on that.

mike-stevenson · 01-03-2014

Madhu,You are a guru! I ended up spannig the upstream port, and confirmed via wireshark that it was the me3600 that was adding the extra tag.I configured a pw-class and set the interworking to ethernet as you advised, and suddenly everything started...

mike-stevenson · 01-01-2014

Madhu,I guess you could consider g0/0/0/2 to be 'CE' facing, though it actually is connected via a short patch lead to port g0/0/0/3 on the same ASR9K where i then run BNG services. I am away from the equipment till tomorrow afternoon, so can not ch...

mike-stevenson · 12-31-2013

HI Madhu, I am sorry i was not more specific. To confirm that I was sending only q-in-q into the me3600, i disconnected the downstream switch, and connected this to my laptop running wireshark, at this point I could confirm that the downstream switc...

Member Since	‎06-22-2004 01:26 PM
Date Last Visited	‎08-18-2017 03:57 AM
Posts	17

User Statistics

User Activity

DHCP and ambiguous VLANS

redistribute subscriber -is this valid?

leaking subscribers between VRFs

double-tag becomes triple-tag me3600 to ASR91K

IPoE BNG and DHCP on the ASR9K

Hi Peter,yes we had major

Hmm I don't suppose you would

double-tag becomes triple-tag me3600 to ASR91K

double-tag becomes triple-tag me3600 to ASR91K

double-tag becomes triple-tag me3600 to ASR91K