About Tim Walker

Tim Walker · 02-26-2023

Hi all. Very simple question, I am getting mixed messages about the above? I can't see any where from the GUI or CLI commands to replace the HX Connect self-signed certificate with a customer signed one? Has anyone done it, or knows if it can be don...

Tim Walker · 10-14-2020

Hello all. I have a client who has the following scenario. CUCM 10.5(SU1)UCCX 10.53945 H.323 Gateway The following call setup is as follows and is very straightforward. Inbound PSTN call to the UCCX via the H.323 gateway and then CUCM. CUCM routes i...

Tim Walker · 09-09-2020

Hello all. I have the following scenario. CUCM Cluster – 11.5(SU5)SME Cluster – 12.5(SU2)CUC Cluster – 12.5(SU2) The CUC cluster is integrated into the SME cluster, not the CUCM. My problem is simple. The CUCM cluster transfers an on-net call to a CU...

Tim Walker · 08-11-2020

Hi all. I have a customer that is collapsing back their 3 x CUC clusters to a centralised one hanging off their existing SME cluster. We are just in the pilot phase at the moment but I cannot get MWI working from the CUC to the SME and across to the ...

Tim Walker · 04-08-2019

Hello all. I cannot find any specific information from CIsco that states Expressway 12.5.1 is supported on CUCM 11.5. The link below details support for 8.11 but nothing for 12.5.1. I need to be sure that this is more Cisco being slack in updating th...

Tim Walker · 08-11-2020

Found the issue, it was because the inbound CSS for the CUC trunk to the SME didn't have the Global Learned E164 Numbers partition for ILS learned E164 patterns. So it was that easy!

Tim Walker · 09-17-2019

Hi Martin.I am experiencing this exact problem on a 12.5(SU1) cluster after I did a PCD migration from 10.5. Did you ever find the cause and fix of this issue?

Tim Walker · 06-23-2019

You are all good to upgrade your Expressways to 12.X, I had it officially confirmed by TAC it is supported on CUCM 11.5. Moreover, I have numerous customers using this combination with no problems. Expressways are being used for B2B, MRA and Hybrid C...

Tim Walker · 04-09-2019

For this particular customer all three, they have 4 Expressways connected to their CUCM 11.5 cluster. They have no plans to upgrade to 12.5 until it is more mature, but would like to keep their Expressways current.

Tim Walker · 01-23-2019

Hi Ehab. I have a customer with numerous sites using an ISR 29XX or a 43XX using E1 interfaces. They have a centralised StoneFax solution in their data centre. I have T38 dial-peers that point to the StoneFax server directly and bypass CUCM altoget...

Member Since	‎07-10-2008 07:25 PM
Date Last Visited	‎02-23-2024 12:04 AM
Posts	129
Total Helpful Votes Received	40

User Statistics

User Activity

HXDP 5.0(2a) - HX Connect - Replace Self Signed Certificate

UCCX PSTN Call-Direct Step - Calling Party Number

CUCM-SME-CUC No Ringback on-net transferred calls

Centralised CUC - SME - Leaf Clusters - MWI

Expressway 12.5.1 Compatibility with CUCM 11.5

Re: Centralised CUC - SME - Leaf Clusters - MWI

Re: Problem With Extension Mobility CUCM 11.5

Re: Expressway 12.5.1 Compatibility with CUCM 11.5

Re: Expressway 12.5.1 Compatibility with CUCM 11.5

Re: StoneFax with Cisco