About grobinson23

grobinson23 · 05-08-2014

We currently peer with 2 ISPs using BGP in an active/failover configuration. My company wants to move to a 3 ISP model where Internet traffic is split across the 3 providers so that bandwidth is equally distributed on outgoing traffic across our 2 /...

grobinson23 · 01-10-2014

Despite the fact that I have the following setting:crypto isakmp nat-traversal 10All tunnels are bi-directional. Our l2l tunnels keep dropping due to inactivity. On one client, the tunnel drops and doesn't come back up unless you remove the remote ...

grobinson23 · 11-01-2013

So, in 8.2 If I had an inside interface at 10.10.10.1 and an mpls interface (sec-100) at 10.20.20.1, and I wanted traffic to traverse between the two to interfaces, I could write the following statement:static (inside,mpls) 10.10.10.0 10.10.10.0 netm...

grobinson23 · 10-18-2013

Ok. So, here's the setup:[VPN Applicance1] ------------> IPSEC VPN1 <----------- [ASA 5525 8.6]----------> IPSEC VPN2 <----------- [VPN Applicance2]VPN Appliance 1 is connecting to ASA 5525 with an internal subnet of 192.168.1.0/24.VPN Appliance 2 i...

grobinson23 · 10-01-2013

We have two clients that want to set up l2l IPsec VPN tunnels on an ASA 5525 (8.6) with the same /24 private IP range. Each customer requires access to the same remote /24 private range. Readdressing isn't a likely solution for either customer. Is...

grobinson23 · 05-08-2014

Ok, so with multiple providers, simply prepend them the same and let the providers pick the best path for themselves for inbound.In this case, the iCore switches ARE the edge routers. Would the outbound solution look the same?It looks as if default ...

grobinson23 · 05-08-2014

Thanks!

grobinson23 · 11-03-2013

That did it! That should allow for communication to take place both ways, right?Thanks!

grobinson23 · 10-24-2013

So, it's not possible to do this without modifying the configuration on VPN Appliance1 and VPN Appliance 2?

grobinson23 · 10-01-2013

Excellent! Thank you for your valuable feedback! One last question: With the above scenario: Using the above mentioned real and mapped network and using the 8.6 software NAT configuration format (lets also presume that the remote sites NAT networ...

Member Since	‎08-07-2007 10:48 AM
Date Last Visited	‎08-18-2017 04:01 AM
Posts	45

User Statistics

User Activity

Multihomed eBGP load balancing with 3 ISP's

5525 8.6 tunnels drop due to inactivity

8.2 to 8.3 static nat question

Another question for duplicate private ranges on site to site ipsec

Two customers have the same private range.

Ok, so with multiple

Thanks!

8.2 to 8.3 static nat question

Another question for duplicate private ranges on site to site ip

Re: Two customers have the same private range.