Cisco,I have never in my life been exposed to a "production" piece of equipment with so many bugs, missing features and oddities as the UC320. While I am sure many of you are working hard to reign in the problems, this platform is an utter embarrassm...
I am looking for some help here for my lab setup:I have configured the UC320 and network as follows:Windows SBS2003 serving DHCP:IP 192.168.1.2GW 192.168.1.1DNS 192.168.1.2 (with forwarders setup to 4.2.2.2, etc)DHCP Serves 192.68.1.x subnet for LANA...
I have a UC320 here in the office and have sold the first small job foe to a client. I have worked with a number of platforms over the years, most recently Avaya Partner, Avaya IP office (and IP Office Partner Edition) and Nortel. I am (was?) very ex...
Paul:Nobody said that it wasn't straight forward. If you actually take the time to read the "open letter" and the followup comments, you will find that the issues have more to do with overall system stability, the lack of promissed and industry comm...
Chris,I would argue that the never had "the edge" with Asterisk or any other SMB voice platform. The entire catalog of products (for that matter most any of the "SMB" products) have been poster children for Cisco's ham-fisted floundering in the SMB m...
That is the typical mode of operation for Cisco and why the entire SMB product line is such a failure.Cisco's only perspective is through they eyes of big business where the contracted solution almost always fail to deliver the promised feature set. ...
Not to put you on the spot, but how could you knowingly sell this crap to 200 customers? It has been a bug riddled heap from day one. I suspect you must spend most of your day hiding from your UC320 customers, or laughing the whole way to the bank.
Ted,I would run from Cisco SMB products as fast and hard as you can. The problems with UC320 are systemic and run through (riddle) the entire SMB product line. That is, the problems are more than just software bugs.It appears that Cisco from the top ...
