Hi, I've been trying to stack three switches a SG500-28P a SG500-52P and a SG500X-28P - the SG500s stack fine, however when I added the 500x to the stack, the unit deactivated itself and took itself off the network - not good as it was the core switc...
Hi, I've recently made some config changes with regards to the network on my UC320. I think these are all fine, as the unit is recieving calls, even forwarding them out of the office and remote access as well as internal access to the unit is fine. ...
Hi Moorthy - thanks for that, I wasn't too sure something had changed in firmware 1.4, as I had half read something on the web in another forum with people saying it was going to be the case that you could stack between 500 and 500X, but can't find t...
Thanks Wendy,I managed to sort it - it was strangely enough the network cable requiring to go straight into the UC320 rather than on the switch ports on the back of my router - everything is VLAN aware and Cisco so really not sure why it was playing ...
I think pretty much the product will be dropped and EOL'd over the next 12 months or so. I don't think the Cisco people actually know themselves, but given it's received no firmware updates in what seems like a lifetime and the features promised tw...
Seemed that way when I was testing a unit out - thought it was rather silly given the UC boxes it's supposed to be replacing can do SIP natively, adding the extra CUBE ISR onto the kit list really pushes the cost up!
Wholeheartedly agree with everything William has said. I love the concept of the product, have been a beta tester of it and wished it well, offered feedback and watched it been dropped as Cisco SMB was reorganised and taken into 'big Cisco.' It has...
