Pavel,The samples mentioned above wouldn't apply to this scenario, i.e. either mode on or portchannel with a single interface. They are to provide one of the explanations for why port security is not supported on L2 etherchannel as with an individual...

Hi Kevin,Try the "Interface Utlization Group" in this MIB: "ftp://ftp.cisco.com/pub/mibs/v2/CISCO-IF-EXTENSION-MIB.my regardsJane

Pavel,1.I do believe that with "mode on" only, the implementation will be a lot easier for port security over L2 etherchannel. However with the current releases it will either disallow you from configuring it, or simply ignore the configuration when ...

Matthew,In that case what you've mentioned above is pretty much what we can do. regardsJane

Hi Pavel,Good question. There are some complications when implementing port security on a port channel. Using LACP as an example, each physical port must have its own MAC address, and there's another MAC used for the "virtual" interface which is used...