Hello The simplistic solution would be to add an additional layer 3 interface from your 2911 router into the Netgear and then policy route you lan traffic between the two isps. To do this you may need to network translate your office traffic against the netgear ap subnet to establish connectivity but this all depends on your current setup if this would be applicable to do. Also you dont state if the APs are autonomous or lightweight if the latter how are you managing them. Can you post the configuration of  the 2911 rtr and switch and the aps if applicable. ... View more

Hello Can you post a topology for clarity and if possible a configuration of both routers ... View more

Hello Is this internet traffic to/from a specific network application? Do you have qos applied to the switch /router? Is it slow on either wired/wireless users? What the RTT from/to host on your network to a host on the wan is this the same on the lan? Can you post the config of the switch and router ... View more

Hello Can you elaborate further on your topology regards these two sites, explain how are they connected together, what type of connection is being used on the wan interface ( l2/l3 p2p, vpls.etc..), are you suing any routers, dynamic routing ?     ... View more

Hello To assist you further can you post or explain how your routers are connected to each other, your network and the isps ... View more

Hello Well if your are referring to domain-based nat any changes to the nat order be it for ios /xe etc.. I would expect to be well documented by now if there were differences. ... View more

Hello  Did you save the running config after you enabled port sec mac sticky otherwise the dynamically learn mac isn’t saved to the cam table and it will then have to be relearnt so it’s possible why it allowed you to add a different device  ... View more

Hello Have you acquired the P2P connection off the isp yet or are you seeking a suggestion on this also? ... View more

Hello I cannot access the devices in your PT file what are the access credentials? ... View more

Hello @bhupinder.singh1 wrote: We have a new office (site- B) just two building far from our office (site-A), we have to create p2p connectivity between both office and carry all vlans from site-A to site-B all traffic go through site A . You dont mention what type of P2P connection this is but given what you have said about extending your vlans to both sites i am assuming it is a L2 vpls connection? ... View more

Hello Passive interfaces dont allow any routing information to pass through them- so in ospf this means they wont be allowed to form any ospf adjecencys and will be seen in opsf databse as stub networks.   The passive -interafce default is a good feature to have enabled when you are running an IGP on a device that has lots of routed interfaces and you dont wont all of them by default to have the protential to send/recive routing information, However when you do wish to have a specific interface to actively partcipate in the routing process then you canmake that inerface no passvie by specifiying no passive-inteface xxx ... View more

Hello sh interface x/x switchport ah interface x/x capabilities ... View more

Hello @Steven Williams wrote: why would BGP not be marked as Multi-path? could you try - router bgp xx bgp dmzlink-bw <- all ibgp routers  maximum-paths ibgp xx neighbor xxxx send-community neighbor xxxx dmzlink-bw <ebgp peers ... View more

Hello That seems to be correct- Example: SW1 switch virtual domain 12 switch 1 exit interface range x/x x channel-group 10 mode on interface port-channel 10 switchport switch virtual link 1 no shutdown exit SW2 switch virtual domain 12 switch 2 exit interface range x/x x channel-group 10 mode on interface port-channel 10 switchport switch virtual link 2 no shutdown exit ... View more