I would like to know if it is possible to configure a priority policy-map for class default of a subinterface. I read that you can configure CBWFQ for physical interface/class default and you cant configure LLQ for the class-default.
In IOS XR ASR9000, i can configure LLQ for the class default of subinterface, but will it work ?
... View more
Dears, I have question regardig TDMoIP. I hope you can support and apprecte your support in advance. I have 2 ME3600 swicthe, both of then have OC3 liscence enabled. I implemented SaToP between the two nodes. I configured the controller sonet 1/0/0 as single E1 just for testing. The customer is connected like the following CE (STM-1 interface from SDH) - Node A (ME3600 SW) ----- MPLS ----- Node B (ME3600 SW) - (STM-1 interface from SDH) CE The customer is sourcing the clock through the STM-1 inerface in both sites. So, I would like to use the clock from both sites as the source clock for both of the ends. I do not want to carry the clock from one site to another through ethernet. This is the config. Node A controller SONET 1/0/0 alarm-report all framing sdh clock source line overhead s1s0 0 aug mapping au-4 ! au-4 1 tug-3 1 mode c-12 tug-2 1 e1 1 cem-group 1 unframed tug-2 1 e1 1 framing unframed tug-2 1 e1 1 clock source Line network-clock synchronization mode QL-enabled network-clock input-source 1 controller SONET 1/0/0 network-clock quality-level rx QL-SEC controller SONET 1/0/0 network-clock log ql-changes Node B : same as Node A Please correct me if the configuratuion is wrong. If it is right then what will be the clock source of other E1s that we need to add later on besides the first E1 shown above ? I have noticed through my monitoring system (which has scanning interval of 30s) that the traffic which is 2.05 mb is being 1.9 mb every 20 min. Is this because there is problem in clocking ? Your support is highly apprectaed. looking forward to hearing from you.
... View more
Dears, I would like to set up the OC3 port in ME3600 as VC-4, but I am not able to do that ! The only thing that I can do is to configure it as 3xE3. I would like to use VC-4 in SAToP. Does ME3600 SW have limitations regarding the VC-4 ? Appreciating your support. Kind regards,
... View more
Dears, I am trying to do a load balance through 2 links in OSPF, but i am getting low traffic on one link and high traffic in other link and in other situations I am getting asymetric traffic, upstream through a vlan and downstream through the other vlan. I have the following toplogy: CE -- PE 1 (ASR9K) === PE 2 (ASR9K) --CE Between PEs, I have configured 2 subinterfaces (Vlans) each one is going through different path through my network. Configuration summary, l2vpn (bridge groups, PW), MPLS LDP, OSPF, PE 1 Configuration: mpls ldp router-id 172.17.17.250 neighbor 172.16.16.17 targeted label allocate for mpls interface TenGigE0/0/0/3.1512 ! interface TenGigE0/0/0/3.1517 ipv4 access-list mpls 10 permit ipv4 172.17.17.0 0.0.0.255 any router ospf ASR router-id 172.17.17.18 redistribute connected route-policy permit-loopback1500-only area 0 interface Loopback1512 (172.17.17.18/32) interface TenGigE0/0/0/3.1512 cost 5 interface TenGigE0/0/0/3.1517 cost 5 ! ! route-policy permit-loopback1500-only if destination in (172.17.17.250/32) then pass else drop endif end-policy bridge group ASR bridge-domain A interface Bundle-Ether1.1501 ! neighbor 172.17.17.20 pw-id 4100 mpls static label local 4100 remote 4100 ! ! bridge-domain B interface Bundle-Ether1.1504 ! neighbor 172.17.17.20 pw-id 4101 mpls static label local 4101 remote 4101 ! PE 2 Configuration: mpls ldp router-id 172.16.16.17 neighbor 172.16.16.18 targeted label allocate for mpls interface Bundle-Ether100.1517 ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1.1512 ipv4 access-list mpls 10 permit ipv4 172.16.16.0 0.0.0.255 any 20 permit ipv4 172.17.17.0 0.0.0.255 any router ospf ASR router-id 172.17.17.20 redistribute connected route-policy permit-loopback16 area 0 interface Loopback1512 (172.17.17.20/32) interface Bundle-Ether100.1517 cost 5 ! ! interface GigabitEthernet0/0/0/1.1512 cost 5 ! bridge group ASR bridge-domain A interface TenGigE0/2/0/5.1501 ! neighbor 172.17.17.18 pw-id 4100 mpls static label local 4100 remote 4100 ! ! bridge-domain B interface TenGigE0/2/0/5.1504 ! neighbor 172.17.17.18 pw-id 4101 mpls static label local 4101 remote 4101 ! How can I do 50/50 load balance in that situation ? How the ECMP hash will work ? Any advice would be appreciated. Regards,
... View more