Hi allI have a spine and leaf (non ACI) new setup and I am doing performance tests before it goes into production. My problem surrounds spanning tree and the time taken to converge when a link is disabled.The cores are not connected together but the ...
Hi allWe have remote access VPN setup via Cisco AnyConnect, terminating on the outside interface of the FTD. We also have a site to site VPN in place, from the FTD to a company, and one of the remote access users needs to connect via HTTPS to a serve...
Hi allI need to do a reimage of an SFR module running on an ASA 5508 and part of the process requires the ASA to have anonymous FTP access to an FTP server across the network. To ensure the FTP access is in place before starting the upgrade process I...
Hi all I don't quite understand what we are supposed to be able to do within these sandboxes. For example I have connected to the Cisco modelling labs enterprise lab and I can see the topology and open the console to the devices but1. Do we need to s...
Hi all I have two Windows devices, both connected to the same switch and on the same VLAN. The SVI for the VLAN exists on the firewall. From the firewall (and from other places in fact) I can ping one of the devices but not the other. The two devices...
Here's the output to "show spanning-tree summary" for the four leaves and two cores:LS-1(config-if)# sh span summSwitch is in rapid-pvst modeRoot bridge for: noneL2 Gateway STP is disabledPort Type Default is edgeEdge Port [PortFast] BPDU Guard Defau...
There is no question here about priority determining the path to the root bridge. I mentioned priority above because I used that to influence the choice of root bridge, ie by setting it to a low value on one of the core switches. What I couldn't unde...
All switches are running rapid pvst+What I also don't understand is this: Core 1 has been set as the root bridge by giving it a low priority. Why would any of the leaf switches choose the VPC link as its root port, with a cost of 2, when it has a dir...
I have found that these problem devices are running "industrial protocol" as opposed to standard ip. Does anyone know anything about industrial protocol, particularly in terms of it running on Cisco switches? Is there any issue with compatibility? Th...
