This is done on gns3 dynamips.
[[R1]] --(e1/0)------- (L2 Switch1)------(e1/0)-- [[R6]]
What I'm trying to do is to tag on the R6 generated routes on the way to R1. Between the two routers, EIGRP is running. So I thought I could use distribute-list...
My setup is on gns3, dynamips.
What I'm trying to do is a load balancing between two identical servers using NAT.
The server addresses are 192.168.48.74 and .75. With one public address, I'd like my clients on the internet to access those...
lab topology
I have a PBR configured on R6 which lets a packet from SW1 lo0 heading to the even ones of R1 lo1 go through R4 and a packet from SW1 lo0 heading to the odd ones through R5.
The thing is that the route-map doesn't work when it's conf...
Thank you for the suggestion.After looking into eigrp topology and trying out removing match route-type, I came to the same conclusion as yours. The "match route-type local" doesn't seem to work as it should whereas "match route-type internal" works ...
I do have the address 200.200.17.34 though it's not in any of the loopback interfaces. ISP has that in static routes. I didn't set up the loopback because they don't have any routing protocols between R1 & ISP.
I didn't think that address has to be assigned in an interface. Thataddress needs to be translated, and the article explaining ip nat insidedestination doesn't have any interface assigned with the public addresswhich needs to be translated.Do you thi...
From what I have seen and tried so far, it doesn't seem to have any viable solution. Some people say that I shouldn't have used the main interface when its sub-interface is configured and that it's why unexpected things happen.
Hi, Giuseppe.
Yes, as you have guessed, R4-R5-R6 is the backbone area, R6-SW1 the transit area(67), and SW1-SW2 some other area. I now realize that some part of this lab might not be as simple as a real life one because of all the repeated use of the...
