About ozo@smartbe.be

ozo@smartbe.be · 06-13-2019

Hi,I spent 2 weeks to make it work but no luck. I conclude that there is a bug on RV340 which drops the asymmetric traffic even though FW and DDoS are disabled on it. Regarding the network topology attached, PC2 can ping 10.50.0.1, 10.50.0.2, 192.168...

ozo@smartbe.be · 09-04-2019

not sure but try to exclude VLAN1 from both LAN1 and LAN3

ozo@smartbe.be · 09-04-2019

Regarding the posted config, you have to make sure, VLAN20 is connected to LAN1, VLAN30 is connected to LAN3. Then pinging PCs are supposed to work with this config if local FWs not running on PCs.

ozo@smartbe.be · 09-04-2019

Good morning Jo, I tested latest IOS (1.0.03.16) of RV340 which was released 2019-08-27 and I am really disappointed that the above-mentioned bug still exists. Does Cisco have any plan to fix this issue? and if yes, more or less when will it be avail...

ozo@smartbe.be · 06-18-2019

Following is the capacity and performance of rv340 regarding VPNs. You can compare these with USG 4 and if rv340 is better than USG 4, then I will suggest replace USG 4 with RV340, not put it behind USG 4.

ozo@smartbe.be · 06-17-2019

Writing static routes is not a solution for us since our hosts are Canon printers. To have a fix in next release would be magnifique.

Member Since	‎06-25-2018 03:18 AM
Date Last Visited	‎09-11-2019 12:19 AM
Posts	10
Total Helpful Votes Received	10

User Statistics

User Activity

RV340 dropping asymetric traffic

Re: RV340 inter VLAN routing

Re: RV340 inter VLAN routing

Re: RV340 dropping asymetric traffic

Re: Placing a Cisco RV340 behind a USG Pro 4 for IKEv2/IPsec or SSTP VPN

Re: RV340 dropping asymetric traffic