Hello all, Does anyone know if the qos3outlost has a SNMP MIB? I have been looking for it in the web with no success. I have only found the one for out discards but it is not for the same issue. The thing is that I would like to track oversubscription in one Cisco WS-C6509 (R7000) processor. Thanks in advance, Ainhoa
... View more
Hello!! We are having some problems with the following: We have an uBR10000 with MC520U_D_connector connected in the slots. The issue is that all the cable modems connected to one of the upstream in one of the cards stays at the state initial and they didn`t started to register until we make shutdown/no shutdown in the upstreams. The IOS version is 12.2(33)SCC5, and from what I have seen at the logs there is one error message that says the following: %UBR7100-3-MACADDRERR (x) %UBR7200-3-MACADDRERR %UBR10000-3-MACADDRERR: DHCP Msg with non unicast MAC address. Master Interface [chars] Input Interface [chars] SID = [dec] MAC = [enet] Explanation: An internal software error may have occurred. I don`t where the error is, so I would be grateful if someone could hepl me solving this issue. Don`t hesitate to ask for more information ok? Best regards, Ainhoa
... View more
Hello!! Anyone knows another feature that has the same functionality that "hol-blocking" for a Cisco 6509 (R7000) processor (revision 3.0)?? Every help provided would be very hepful! Thanks, Ainhoa
... View more
Hi there everyone, Matt, I have told our customer to try the hol-blocking, but in their model there is no option to enable/disable it. I am looking througth the web ti see if there is a similar command for it but I have not found nothing. Did you know if there is another way to configure it?Our customer`s is a cisco WS-C6509 (R7000) processor (revision 3.0). If you know another way to solve this issue please don`t hesitate to tell me ok? I would be grateful if you do so. Thanks, Ainhoa
... View more
Hi Matt, Our customers line card is a WS-X6548-GE-TX , so I think it would be possible what you are saying. Besides, I have found one Cisco bug that says the following: When a WS-X6548-GE-TX-CR or WS-X6148-GE-TX port is configured as a SPAN destination and the aggregate bandwidth of the spanned traffic exceeds the SPAN destination port's capacity, user can see performance issues on other ports within the same group. A group of ports is defined as a group of 8-ports (ie 1-8, 9-16,17-24, etc..) Workaround: Disable destination SPAN to ports of above module (or) put the SPAN destination port in a group where there is nothing connected. I have asked our customer to try to put these ports alone to see what happend. I would tell you something when I have the results. Thanks for the information. Ainhoa
... View more
Hi Shashank, As far as I know, there is no too much trafficc through these ports so I don`t know if enabling the flow-control is going to help but I am going to ask our customer to try it, at least on one of the interfaces experiencing the issue. Thanks, Ainhoa P.S. I have rate your responses
... View more
Hi Shashank, Thank you for the response. I have some questions about it. You suggest to enable flow-control on the ports that have them qos3Outlost counters incrementing. What I wanted to know if this would affect to the service provided by our customer or not. On the other hand, I would also like to tell you that we have the interfaces indentified and, like I said, there are the ones that have the SPAM enable. We tried to disable it and catch the counters value again, and it kept incrementing. This only happend on the last octect of the 6509. I don`t know if there is any bug that explains this situation, that with SPAM enable the counters increment...or something. I would be grateful if you could answer me these question. Thanks, Ainhoa
... View more
Hi, I have one problem with some ports of one Cisco 6509 with the following IOS version: c6sup22-pk2sv-mz.121-26.E6.bin. We look through the oversubscription counters once peer week, and in the last weeks we have seen a noticeable increment on the ports that have SPAM enable. We have prove to remove the SPAM but the counters are still growing. We have also notice, that on some of the ports that are "disabled" there is oversubscription, I mean, the value of the counters of qos3Outlost have a non-zero value. Please if you know something about this help me. Don`t hesitate to ask for more information or details you need ok? Thanks, Ainhoa
... View more