Try something like (this example is for two different servers):
POOL1 is the first internal server and ports 100 to 300 are NATed through. POOL2 is a second server and ports 500 to 1000 are NATed through.
ip nat pool POOL1 192.168.1.1 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 type rotary ip nat pool POOL2 192.168.1.2 192.168.1.2 netmask 255.255.255.0 type rotary ip nat inside destination list 101 pool POOL1 ip nat inside destination list 102 pool POOL2 access-list 101 permit tcp any any range 100 300 access-list 102 permit tcp any any range 500 1000
... View more
Jimmy, based purely on what you have in the diagram, this will not work because you can't have the same IP network existing in two locations and still be able to talk between the two. There are a couple of options including those already mentioned. You may want to consider using bridging across the routers and connecting the two IP networks via layer 2 rather than having the two segments seperated by a layer 3 network between the two routers. Another solution, and maybe the most feasible if the configuration as shown is set in stone, is to use NAT. It would require setting up static entries and no two IP addresses can overlap between the two segments, but it would work. A word of caution, this will likely result in a high degree of administrative headache after a while.
... View more