I have an existing MPLS Pseudowire connection that I need to rework to be able to carry vlan tags instead of just plain L2 frames.Existing setup:ME3400 <-> 7206VXR <-> 7206VXR <-> ME3400The ME3400's customer facing int tags incoming frames, which go ...
I'm trying to bootstrap myself on MPLS and ran into an unusual problem in the field.We've got a mesh of routers setup to do tag switching amongst each other to support a few pseudo-wire MPLS point to point links for customers.Our typical conf:ip cefm...
I've got a large fleet of Copper Mountain CE200 DSLAMs deployed using vWAN (crude 1483 bridging implimentation) over ethernet to cisco routers. A given site will have anywheres from 1 to 5 CE200s, hanging off of one faste port on a 7200VXR or 4500M+...
I'm going to be deploying a router that will have network interfaces on both our private and public networks. The public side will have N+1 uplinks, and doing ospf on those links for redundancy. This also means the router will have a full route tab...
I'm building a gigabit ring between 3 pops. Lets call them A, B, and C. The majority of the traffic will be going between A and C. A and C, will have one direct gigabit connection, and a second that makes one hop through B. Each leg of the link w...
First point - The public network is our public, fully routeable, connected to the intenet IP space.Second point - Yeah, I was afraid my explanation wasn't the best. Kinda hard to put it down on paper sans diagrams. We have a large public IP network...
Ok, if I'm reading this correctly, if I'm not exepecting to expand beyond 3 border routers to mesh with IBGP, than staying with the simple IBGP mesh is a clean/viable solution. If I'm likely to expand the number of IBGP peers, using RRs becomes adva...
GLBP looks like it solves one problem I've been having with my current land design layout I've been testing. Using the pop layout above, I've got two vlans acting as totally separate ethernet switched networks. Each piece of equipment has one conne...
Drat, that takes a nice quick option and doubles the cost... I have a 7513 in a similar bind as I will be implimenting a vlan subinterface on it's primary lan interface and will have to break the backup-interface setup on it as well.