01-13-2014 02:55 AM - edited 03-21-2019 08:01 AM
Dear Dan,
How you do "blf+cp" for parking slot number ?
In draytek IPPBX3510 :
Parking Server Number : 777
Parking Slot Range . 81 to 90
When i have a call, i forward it to 777 and i receive a message from pbx with slot number like "81"
In cisco spa5xx, i have make a
fnc=blf+cp;sub=81@10.0.0.254;ext=81@10.0.0.254;nme=81
but my "led" is always "amber" .. is still my "draytek error" ?
I just view "SIP/2.0 404 Not Found" from draytek response to subscrive event.
Regards
Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::SUBSCRIBE sip:81@10.0.0.254 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.86:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fbc60477
From: "203" <sip:203@10.0.0.254>;tag=b01596ef12af7b62
To: <sip:81@10.0.0.254>
Call-ID: 75ba63b3-f5d1756e@10.0.0.86
CSeq: 20696 SUBSCRIBE
Max-Forwards: 70
Contact: "203" <sip:203@10.0.0.86:5060>
Accept: application/dialog-info+xml
Expires: 1800
Event: dialog
User-Agent: Cisco/SPA501G-7.5.5
Content-Length: 0
Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>
Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>
Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>[0:5060]<<10.0.0.254:5060
Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>[0:5060]<<10.0.0.254:5060
Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::SIP/2.0 404 Not Found
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.0.0.86:5060;branch=z9hG4bK-fbc60477
From: "203" <sip:203@10.0.0.254>;tag=b01596ef12af7b62
To: <sip:81@10.0.0.254>;tag=7564
Call-ID: 75ba63b3-f5d1756e@10.0.0.86
CSeq: 20696 SUBSCRIBE
Server: Draytek Mars 1.0.0
Content-Length: 0
Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>
Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>
Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<134>
Mon Jan 13 2014 11:31:11 GMT+0100 (CET)::10.0.0.86::<151>SUBS Failed 19 27 17
01-13-2014 08:07 AM
It's generic discussion forum, you should not ask just me personally here ...
Well. Draytek is just rejecting the subscription. I'm not fammilar with Draytek so I don't know it's bug or not. If you thing the Draytek should publish parl slot 81 state under the name 81 then ask Draytek's support for help, but it sounds suspicious a lot for me. If Draytek is publishing park slot 81 state, I expect other name for it than just 81.
All at all, it seems not to be something that Cisco can help you with.
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide