The indecision Paul talks about in respect of the UC320W is in sharp relief to the Cisco OnPlus Agent and Service where there is community consultation on roadmap development and rapid delivery of these features. I can only think Matthew is right and that Cisco thinks the features requested for the UC320W will bastardise their UC540/560 market. At the lower end of that market they are probably right. However, in my country a recent government report stated that 97 percent of all business enterprises employee less 19 people or less. These enterpises employ around 80 percent of the working population. By nature of their size these businesses simply cannot afford the UC500 range of products. It is a huge market for a product of the UC320W's ilk but these business will not be fobbed off with a product like the current UC320W with a very limited range of features.
Right now the indecision in how this product is to develop means we do not sell it, albeit we believe it has great potential. However, we can't sell potential without a defined and commited roadmap and commitment from Cisco to the product. If not that, then please put us all out of our misery and EOL the UC320W.
Does the recently released SPA302D DECT handset have potential to be a DECT solution for the UC320W?
Regards
Stephen
