cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel

SPA8800 with CMBE3K

henie
Beginner
Beginner

Hi Team,

Can you please comment on below questions.

1) Is there a restriction to the amount of SPA8800 supported on the CUCMBE3K ?

2) Is there any feature reduction with going with the SPA8800 over the VG224 apart from quantity of FXS ports? Will the faxes still be able to send faxes via the SPA8800 and be able to receive faxes (I see that CUCMBE3K support FAX pass-through, relay etc) ?

Thanks,

Henry

1 ACCEPTED SOLUTION

Accepted Solutions

sanjsinh
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

1) There is no hard limitation on number of SPA gateways that are supported on BE3K

2) SPA8800 also supports FXO ports also in addition to FXS ports. There is no reduction in feature. T.38 fax is supported on SPA 8800.

Sanjay

View solution in original post

1 REPLY 1

sanjsinh
Cisco Employee
Cisco Employee

1) There is no hard limitation on number of SPA gateways that are supported on BE3K

2) SPA8800 also supports FXO ports also in addition to FXS ports. There is no reduction in feature. T.38 fax is supported on SPA 8800.

Sanjay

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community: