I'm currently going over the benefits of migrating from phase 2 to phase 3 for our DMVPN network. One of the issues with phase 2 is doing summarization at the hub for the other spoke networks. Currently, the spokes are summarizing their own networks via EIGRP to the hub and the hub is then re-advertising this summary route to the remaining spokes. In phase 3, I will do all of the summarizing at the hub, but I'm not seeing that as a huge benefit compared to the spokes doing it.
Are there any issues with doing the summarization at the spokes in phase 2? What are the benefit of having the hub do summarization in phase 2 compared to the spokes doing summarization in phase 2? To me, it looks like its accomplishing the same goal. I feel like there is something that I'm not realizing here.
With the enhancements in ISE 3.0 for integrating with Azure AD via SAML IdP, it is now possible to leverage Microsoft Single Sign-On for multiple ISE Portals (for example Sponsor and Guest/BYOD Portals).
At the time of this writing, ISE cann...
With the enhancements in ISE 3.0 for integrating with Azure AD via SAML IdP, it is now possible to create a BYOD Flow to provide Wireless network access using an employee’s Azure AD credentials.
The table below shows the whole Cisco Security solutions + Splunk integrations add-ons. Kindly let me know if I have missed some add-ons or if there are any new updates. Thank you!
Hope this will be helpful for everyone who is looking for Splunk in...
A python based script to generate report if there are disabled rules under an Access Control Policy and an option to delete those rules in bulk.
Step 1 Download the script on PCStep 2 Make sure python3 is installed on PC and have reach...
A python based script to generate report if there are double logging on FMC ACP (logging at beginning and end), having rule action "Allow" or "Trust". (Option1 )
Also, the logging at the begging will be disabled if logging is detected for both beginning ...