Client performance on Cisco 7500 Flex controller with version 126.96.36.199 work fine but high latency on code 188.8.131.52.
After upgrading, ping times from clients has gone from ~10ms to ~2500ms. I have a Cisco 7500 Flex controller, when running controller code version 184.108.40.206 client performance was as expected. When using code 220.127.116.11 performance is terrible. I have tried upgrade to 18.104.22.168 and clean configuration (reset) with 22.214.171.124 with the same results.
I have tested using 3502i APs with the signal metrics (from AP) reported by the clients (all testing close to these figures):
Signal Strength : -48 dBm
Signal to Noise : 49 dB
AP's are in HREAP/Flex mode. The WLANs use HREAP/FlexConnect local switching. I have tested WLAN's with WPA2-PSK and 802.1x/WPA2 with the same results. I have
Several clients\operating systems , laptops, ipads, iphone have been tested and all experience consistently poor ping latency performance on both 2.4Ghz and 5 Ghz when using controller code 126.96.36.199.
When it is switched between 188.8.131.52 and 184.108.40.206 the results are consistent; good performance on 220.127.116.11 and terrible performance on 18.104.22.168. We would like to use 22.214.171.124 for its enhanced FlexConnect features.
Here is the bug what we are hitting and here is the workaround:-
Just started to investigate a medium/large network setup where it seems all of the LWAPs are connected to switchports configured as trunks and all of the LWAPs are in local mode. Each switchport is configured like this... interface GigabitEthernet2/0...
Hi together, i am new in this community and hopefully i have a easy question for you experts, but i am working hours on it and can´t figure out what is wrong.I have running a wlc 5500 with 16 AP´s, different VLans for different ISP, everything is running ...
Hello, I'm wondering if when you set multiple mandatory data rates, example 3, that means a client MUST support these 3 data rates or it has to support one among the 3 mandatory data rates ? Example, most of our rf profiles 5Ghz Data Rates are c...
Just wondering if there is a workaround to supporting two factor authentication with the Client VPN. The url here says it doesn't without using a third party tool: https://documentation.meraki.com/zGeneral_Administration/Other_Topics/Two-Factor_Authe...
Hi,Trying to apply Per-User Bandwidth Contract from ISE on a WLAN based on if the client has a valid certificate or not.If I configure Per-User Bandwidth Contract direcly on the hole WLAN in the WLC the clients that connect get restricted BW in both direc...