9.3 MB/s >>>>802.11AC5GHz : ???

[amh4y0001]

Hi,

5 Ghz band shows 9.3 MB/s transmission rate, is this something normal? Can we expect GB/s with this band?

Edit: Assigned " channel width 80 " and still transmission rate shows 9.3 Mb/s

[Sandeep Choudhary]

No its not normal ;)

Change the channel to 80MHz and give a try again.

Regards

Don't forget to rate helpful posts

[amh4y0001]

Hi, I loged out and log in again to avoid any cach issues... but still results are same. Even I have enabled 80 MHZ, data rate is still 9.3. Here is running config: ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

interface Dot11Radio1
 no ip address
 !
 encryption mode ciphers aes-ccm
 !
 ssid MassProduction_AC
 !
 antenna gain 0
 peakdetect
 no dfs band block
 stbc
 speed  basic-6.0 9.0 basic-12.0 18.0 basic-24.0 36.0 48.0 54.0 m0. m1. m2. m3.                                                                                         m4. m5. m6. m7. m8. m9. m10. m11. m12. m13. m14. m15. m16. m17. m18. m19. m20. m                                                                                        21. m22. m23. a1ss9 a2ss9 a3ss9
 channel width 80
 channel dfs
 station-role root
 bridge-group 1
 bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
 bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
 bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
 no bridge-group 1 source-learning
 no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
!
interface GigabitEthernet0

[Sandeep Choudhary]

Hi,

Web-interface of Cisco AP is really slow. Please wait and do refresh, it will show the correct Transmission rates.

Regards

Don't forget to rate helpful posts

[amh4y0001]

Access the web interface from a diffirent browser but same (but will wait and check again).

Running Configs shows the correct configurations for 80 MHZ?

[Sandeep Choudhary · Accepted solution]

I know its same for all browser ;)

From my point of view...config looks correct.

Regards

Don't forget to rate helpful posts

[amh4y0001]

Thanks Sandeep!