cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
590
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

for 5508 controller AP sso

Hi

in our project they are two wireless controller of 5508

we have  to configure  AP sso for two wlc

the licenses we have purchased for only for one controller

the details as shown as below

Cisco AIR-CT5508-500-K9 Cisco 5508 Series Wireless Controller for up to 500 APs
Cisco
CON-SNT-CT08500
SNTC-8X5XNBD Cisco 5508 Series
Cisco LIC-CT5508-BASE Base Software License
Cisco LIC-CT5508-500 500 AP Base license
Cisco SWC5500K9-80 Cisco Unified Wireless Controller SW Release 8.0
Cisco AIR-PWR-CORD-UK AIR Line Cord United Kingdom
Cisco AIR-PWR-5500-AC Cisco 5500 Series Wireless Controller Redundant Power Supply
Cisco AIR-CT5508-HA-K9 Cisco 5508 Series Wireless Controller for High Availability
Cisco CON-SNT-CT5508HA 1YR, SNTC 8X5XNBD Cisco 5508 Series Wi

my question in fail over for wlc reduancy we will assign for each AP in high Availabilty the primary and secondary ip address

in APSSO how does fail over work

in each AP how to assign primary and secondary ip address for each APs in APSSO

and the licences are purchased for only one controller

experts please advice the working of these topology of APSSO for two controller

2 Accepted Solutions

Accepted Solutions

Scott Fella
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Syed,

With SSO, you initially have to have an ip for both controllers.  Then when you setup SSO, the HA controller will be the backup of the primary.  License is only required on the non-HA sku controller.  Failover will automatically happen without a glitch to the AP's or end users.  

If you went with N+1 and not use SSO, then you need an ip for each controller and each controller needs to be configured.  There are many deployments of N+1 out there, but SSO is getting popular due to the fast failover.  The only issue is if SSO gets corrupt then both are down and that's the benefit of N+1.

Your list is fine for either.

-Scott 

*** Please rate helpful posts ***

-Scott
*** Please rate helpful posts ***

View solution in original post

Here is a good doc that explains the design

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/7-5/High_Availability_DG.html

-Scott 

*** Please rate helpful posts ***

-Scott
*** Please rate helpful posts ***

View solution in original post

2 Replies 2

Scott Fella
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Syed,

With SSO, you initially have to have an ip for both controllers.  Then when you setup SSO, the HA controller will be the backup of the primary.  License is only required on the non-HA sku controller.  Failover will automatically happen without a glitch to the AP's or end users.  

If you went with N+1 and not use SSO, then you need an ip for each controller and each controller needs to be configured.  There are many deployments of N+1 out there, but SSO is getting popular due to the fast failover.  The only issue is if SSO gets corrupt then both are down and that's the benefit of N+1.

Your list is fine for either.

-Scott 

*** Please rate helpful posts ***

-Scott
*** Please rate helpful posts ***

Here is a good doc that explains the design

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/7-5/High_Availability_DG.html

-Scott 

*** Please rate helpful posts ***

-Scott
*** Please rate helpful posts ***
Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card