09-03-2016 02:04 PM - edited 07-05-2021 05:46 AM
Hi
in our project they are two wireless controller of 5508
we have to configure AP sso for two wlc
the licenses we have purchased for only for one controller
the details as shown as below
Cisco | AIR-CT5508-500-K9 | Cisco 5508 Series Wireless Controller for up to 500 APs |
Cisco | CON-SNT-CT08500 |
SNTC-8X5XNBD Cisco 5508 Series |
Cisco | LIC-CT5508-BASE | Base Software License |
Cisco | LIC-CT5508-500 | 500 AP Base license |
Cisco | SWC5500K9-80 | Cisco Unified Wireless Controller SW Release 8.0 |
Cisco | AIR-PWR-CORD-UK | AIR Line Cord United Kingdom |
Cisco | AIR-PWR-5500-AC | Cisco 5500 Series Wireless Controller Redundant Power Supply |
Cisco | AIR-CT5508-HA-K9 | Cisco 5508 Series Wireless Controller for High Availability |
Cisco | CON-SNT-CT5508HA | 1YR, SNTC 8X5XNBD Cisco 5508 Series Wi |
my question in fail over for wlc reduancy we will assign for each AP in high Availabilty the primary and secondary ip address
in APSSO how does fail over work
in each AP how to assign primary and secondary ip address for each APs in APSSO
and the licences are purchased for only one controller
experts please advice the working of these topology of APSSO for two controller
Solved! Go to Solution.
09-03-2016 02:21 PM
Syed,
With SSO, you initially have to have an ip for both controllers. Then when you setup SSO, the HA controller will be the backup of the primary. License is only required on the non-HA sku controller. Failover will automatically happen without a glitch to the AP's or end users.
If you went with N+1 and not use SSO, then you need an ip for each controller and each controller needs to be configured. There are many deployments of N+1 out there, but SSO is getting popular due to the fast failover. The only issue is if SSO gets corrupt then both are down and that's the benefit of N+1.
Your list is fine for either.
-Scott
*** Please rate helpful posts ***
09-03-2016 02:23 PM
Here is a good doc that explains the design
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/7-5/High_Availability_DG.html
-Scott
*** Please rate helpful posts ***
09-03-2016 02:21 PM
Syed,
With SSO, you initially have to have an ip for both controllers. Then when you setup SSO, the HA controller will be the backup of the primary. License is only required on the non-HA sku controller. Failover will automatically happen without a glitch to the AP's or end users.
If you went with N+1 and not use SSO, then you need an ip for each controller and each controller needs to be configured. There are many deployments of N+1 out there, but SSO is getting popular due to the fast failover. The only issue is if SSO gets corrupt then both are down and that's the benefit of N+1.
Your list is fine for either.
-Scott
*** Please rate helpful posts ***
09-03-2016 02:23 PM
Here is a good doc that explains the design
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/7-5/High_Availability_DG.html
-Scott
*** Please rate helpful posts ***
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide