cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
902
Views
0
Helpful
2
Replies

Virtual WLC 7.5 - AP Enforced Rate Limiting

Bill
Level 1
Level 1

In the vWLC 7.5 deployment guide in the enhancments section, there is a feature called "AP Enforced Rate Limiting"

But I cannot find any information beyond that.

Here is the guide:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/technotes/7.5/Cisco_VirtualWirelessController75.html#wp43370

Looking how this might be implemented.

In particular to rate limit traffic by WLAN.

My understanding is that the Bandwidth Contracts under the WLAN QOS settings do not apply.

Thanks

2 Replies 2

aqjaved
Level 3
Level 3

Rate  limiting is enforced at the AP level. It is not possible to enforce  rate limiting at the virtual controller level because per client  downstream rate limiting is not supported for central switching WLANs  when traffic is terminated at the virtual controller.

Per  client downstream rate limiting is supported if the virtual controller  is a foreign controller tunneling traffic to another controller  platform, for example, a Cisco 5500 Series Wireless LAN Controller.

Table 3 Rate Limiting with Cisco Virtual Wireless LAN   Controller

Traffic

FlexConnect   Central Switching

Flex   Connect Local Switching

Flex   Connect Standalone

Per client Downstream

Not Supported

Supported

Supported

Per SSID Downstream

Supported

Supported

Supported

Per client Upstream

Supported

Supported

Supported

Per SSID Upstream

Supported

Supported

Supported

Please check the below guide which may be helpful for you

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/release/notes/crn75.html

Aqeel

Thanks for the info.

As usual I got myself confused, as I was looking at the 7.5 deployment guide and reading 7.4 release notes.

I see in the 7.5 release notes it is as you stated.

What was getting me is that I was testing in my lab on 7.5 and it did not work with local switching.

But I was using an old 1130 AP.

I tested in a production environment with a 2600 AP and it worked as expected.

Maybe that feature is specific to the type of AP.

Thanks again

Bill

Getting Started

Find answers to your questions by entering keywords or phrases in the Search bar above. New here? Use these resources to familiarize yourself with the community:

Review Cisco Networking products for a $25 gift card