10-20-2004 08:56 PM - edited 07-04-2021 10:05 AM
Hi All
Iam working with an ISP in India
we have Good corporate Leased Lines as well as Dial-up Connection Serving
with one DS3 connection
Now i would like to start the Wi-Fi Internet cells in the area of 10KM
Radius, in the City,
Creating number of cells with the distance of each cell is 2KM or 3KM max
iam already using Cisco/Wilan/Micronet for point-to-point
But for the new setup I would like to give a connection to the user non-line
of sight based connection
for both home as well as SOHO's
any body have solution / products/ as well as integration partners
Looking forward to hear from the experts
Regards
hare
10-23-2004 06:22 AM
For frequencies at and above 900MHz, line-of-site is pretty much a necessity.
In the US, or at least around Chicago, the central antennas are on top of very tall buildings, mostly in the center of the city.
The client antennas (most often) are also mounted on the roof with enough of a mast to get them above the treeline so that they maintain line-of-sight (and a a little more - trees grow). I've seen masts of 20 feet ( ~6 meters) or so on some buildings.
There just aren't many options; line-of-sight is critical for operation ... elevate or add more central points to increase your chances of visibility. Trees absorb the signal, buildings block/reflect the signal.
Good Luck
Scott
10-27-2004 10:14 PM
hi
just a query. that how come cellphone operators above 900 MHZ are able to have their signals inside the building which is pretty non-line of sight. Also i have seen certain radios which claim to work on non-line of sight. hOW IS that possible.
10-30-2004 07:44 AM
It boils down to several factors: Saturation from multiple angles, and the "bouncyness" of the signal.
900 Mhz cell phones in an elevator (for example) usually died when the doors close. 900Mhz doesn't penetrate well, and doesn't expecially bounce well (at least not as well as 2 or 5 Gig). 900Mhz is also a much longer wave and needs a larger opening to "squeeze through."
If you can put up an 802.11 network with the same density as a cellular network, then I'd expect that you can have generally the same coverage.
Certainly it can be discussed at a much deeper technical level, but it basically comes down to signal saturation, and the propagation characteristics of the RF in use.
FWIW
Scott
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide