03-15-2004 02:06 PM - edited 03-02-2019 02:17 PM
Currently have a remote branch with a 1760 and a T1 doing a IPSec vpn tunnel to a 3660. I would like to add a 2nd T1 on the 1760 and bond them to get 3Mbps and still maitain the vpn tunnel. What's the recommendation? Use PPP Multilink or CEF? Any config examples?
Thanks!
03-15-2004 04:52 PM
I think Multilink PPP is a better bet for load sharing, but it can increase CPU utilization in some cases to a greater extent that is desirable. So I generally recommend trying MLPPP first, and if CPU usage becomes too high, revert to per-packet CEF instead.
(I'm assuming you have a hardware VPN encryption module in the 1760, as I don't think a 1760 could saturate even a single T1 doing software 3DES encryption.)
03-15-2004 04:57 PM
Thanks for the reply, and yes we do have the vpn aim module in the 1760. Do you know where I could find some config examples by chance?
03-16-2004 01:03 AM
MLPPP cfg
But keep an eye on Cpu.
interface Multilink1
ip address a.b.c.d
load-interval 30
no cdp enable
ppp multilink
multilink-group 1
interface serial 1/0:1
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
ppp multilink
multilink-group 1
interface serial 1/0:2
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
ppp multilink
multilink-group 1
CEF Per-packet-loadsharing...Check if Cef is supported.
ip CEF
interface serial 1/0:1
ip address a.b.c.d
ip load-sharing per-packet
interface serial 1/0:2
ip address a.b.c.d
ip load-sharing per-packet
Discover and save your favorite ideas. Come back to expert answers, step-by-step guides, recent topics, and more.
New here? Get started with these tips. How to use Community New member guide