cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
cancel
545
Views
5
Helpful
6
Replies

4 vs 6 Antenna Leads - 9120AXE

luiggi-moreira
Spotlight
Spotlight

Hi All.

I have a question about two different AccelTex types of antennas.

Wireless design phase stated that we should use this: ATS-OP-245-8-4RPTP-36

However, we only have this one model available in our stock: ATS-OP-245-8-6RPTP-36

Therefore, antenna gain is the same, connector RP-TNC is the same... however, the number of antenna leads to be used is actually 4.

But, by using the one below with 6 leads, 2 leads would be left unconnected.

In my opinion, there shouldn't be any issue but really wanted advices or tips to confirm my thought because we are using 9120AXE with only 4-port anyways.

Can anyone help me with that?

Thank you!

1 Accepted Solution

Accepted Solutions

luiggi-moreira
Spotlight
Spotlight

Hi folks.

 I had a call with the AccelTex and it seems they are right now running out of 4 lead antenna.
So, their RF Antenna Design team advised that the answer is YES, we can use the 6-lead antenna in the meantime with unnoticeable difference.
Their comments below:

"Yes, you can use the 6-element model and leave two leads disconnected. Best practice would be to have the two unenergized/disconnected elements be the two outside cables. This has the most physical separation amongst the elements and is simple to tell installers."

 

Thank you, all!

View solution in original post

6 Replies 6

balaji.bandi
Hall of Fame
Hall of Fame

Personally i would not suggest that, for better outcome use correct product always suggested.

https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/catalyst-9100ax-access-points/guide-c07-742311.html

BB

***** Rate All Helpful Responses *****

How to Ask The Cisco Community for Help

jagan.chowdam
Spotlight
Spotlight

I doubt ATS-OP-245-8-6RPTP-36 is supported to use with  Cisco C9120AXE. 

I would check with Acceltex sales support "sales@acceltex.com" before using these antennas.

 

Jagan Chowdam

/**Pls rate useful responses**/

Thank you @jagan.chowdam , I just sent them a message on the email you provided. Thank you!

It all depends on the antenna design. In some, it may reduce the antenna performance and some may not work as expected. 

In your case, I believe you'll see degraded performance with only 4 leads instead of provided 6. 

The  Antenna page from Acceltex shows only the following APs are compatible.

  • Cisco 3502e
  • Meraki MR46E
  • Meraki MR53E

Ref: https://www.hubbell.com/acceltex/en/products/2-45-ghz-8-dbi-6-element-indooroutdoor-patch-antenna-with-rptnc/p/14675177

Jagan

luiggi-moreira
Spotlight
Spotlight

Thanks @balaji.bandi , we usually use AccelTex models and never faced any issues with that.

My concern is more about the fact of having 2 leads unconnected. But, theoretically, I don't think it should affect something.

Well, there is an existing difference between these 2 antenna models that I mentioned, that is, the horizontal beamwidth between them has slight value difference, but nothing that would have great impact on the design.

luiggi-moreira
Spotlight
Spotlight

Hi folks.

 I had a call with the AccelTex and it seems they are right now running out of 4 lead antenna.
So, their RF Antenna Design team advised that the answer is YES, we can use the 6-lead antenna in the meantime with unnoticeable difference.
Their comments below:

"Yes, you can use the 6-element model and leave two leads disconnected. Best practice would be to have the two unenergized/disconnected elements be the two outside cables. This has the most physical separation amongst the elements and is simple to tell installers."

 

Thank you, all!

Review Cisco Networking for a $25 gift card