How to Expand TCAM on Cisco 9400 Series Switches

[LeJus]

The results of the current command execution are as follows:

# show platform hardware fed active fwd resource tcam utilization

Codes: EM - Exact_Match, I - Input, O - Output, IO - Input & Output, NA - Not Applicable CAM Utilization for ASIC [0]
Table Subtype Dir Max Used %Used V4 V6 MPLS Other
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
...
IP Route Table TCAM I 65536 65536 100.00% 65527 6 2 1
...

If TCAM extension is possible Or if there is another way, please let me know.

Please note that SDM Prefer is available only in Access.

[Translator]

The results of the current command execution are as follows:

# show platform hardware fed active fwd resource tcam utilization

Codes: EM - Exact_Match, I - Input, O - Output, IO - Input & Output, NA - Not Applicable CAM Utilization for ASIC [0]
Table Subtype Dir Max Used %Used V4 V6 MPLS Other
—
...
IP Route Table TCAM I 65536 65536 100.00% 65527 6 2 1
...

If TCAM extension is possible Or if there is another way, please let me know.

Please note that SDM Prefer is available only in Access.

[Translator]

There is hardware limitations. Please lower down prefixes by summary routes so that aggregate of routes install in routing table.

[Translator]

Approximately 99% of the routing table is received from BGP.
Is it possible to lower the prefix of this routing?
I do not have the authority to modify the other party's BGP route prefix.
In this case, is it possible to replace it with static routing?

[Translator]

If you can request other party to send aggregate routes, that will solve your problem.

[Translator]

Oh thank you so so much for the reply!!!

[shambhu.kumar]

There is hardware limitations. Please lower down prefixes by summary routes so that aggregate of routes install in routing table.

[LeJus]

Approximately 99% of the routing table is received from BGP.
Is it possible to lower the prefix of this routing?
I do not have the authority to modify the other party's BGP route prefix.
In this case, is it possible to replace it with static routing?

[shambhu.kumar]

If you can request other party to send aggregate routes, that will solve your problem.

[LeJus]

Oh thank you so so much for the reply!!!