Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hey,I'm using CSA 5.1 MC and deploying agent kits that are 0.69. I've stumbled over an issue that has me kind of puzzled. After deploying an agent kit, I would assign additional groups to the host. Sounds easy, but now I have a few hosts that are ...
Hmm, you'll need to contact Cisco licensing department. My suggestion would be to open a ticket and have them assist you in getting the proper date with association to that license file. The upside is that you have time to get it corrected
Now I gotcha! Lemme bite on that one for a few. We've never really had the need to accomplish that. mainly because we keep a standard naming for things like MAILINSIDE.. MAILOUTSITE.. and if we were to migrate those into CSM, it would have a namin...
We're running 3.1 as well.Now, if you're doing individual naming for firewall ACL's.. I don't believe that comes over. I thought you were talking about the firewalls object-group's.
Hmm, I'm not overly sure about this. We've populated our Networks/Hosts section merely by discovering our firewalls. I've got hosts and networks both populated with the corresponding object names. I might be misunderstanding what you're saying, if...
My understanding is that you'd just discover the device. Everything that is configured will port over and can be manipulated in the Policy Object Manager. You can then attribute these objects to a shared policy or whatever you want.
