Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I have been looking into the Cisco NGFW IPS and CX for Internet threat detection and prevention. What i cannot wrap my head around is that the CX seems to be as much as an IPS as the regular IPS module, but it is not nearly as up to date with the sig...
I see.But still, CX IPS are missing critical signatures like "Heartbleed" and "ShellShock". Is there any paper from Cisco explaining why they do not keep the signatures up to date, or even if it will improve in the future ?
Thanks for the reply. Thats great and all, but the IPS module for CX cannot even compare to the dedicated IPS. So many CVE threat signatures that is missing. Is this something that will improve? Any reason why there are so few?