Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I have an ASA on which I'm trying to use PBR to route to one of two ISPs which
I'll call "slow" and "fast."
The interface to the slow ISP is connected to a subnet on which the next-hop
address is clearly in the subnet and it would count as "directly ...
No talk about roadmap but best practices are basically what we implemented.
I think that what you are attempting to do can work just fine, if you want to treat the pppoe as a backup then use PBR to route everything out the non-pppoe interface. I have...
I have it configured and running with great help from TAC.
As I noted earlier, the pppoe interface cannot be the secondary interface, most likely because it sets a default route with metric 1 when it finds out what the next hop is. This also makes so...
First word back from TAC is that PBR+pppoe as the secondary route is a known limitation but not documented as such.
We are supposed to be able to allow the pppoe interface to have the primary route and use the static (slow in this example) be a back...
Wow, thanks for re-creating the problem.
I see what happened when I removed the default route to the slow ISP, the route out the pppoe interface became the default route because of "ip address pppoe set route." The other thing that happened is that ...
Thanks so much for taking an interest in this. I'm starting think that this is a problem with pppoe and routing and not PBR.
I trie switching the default route to the fast ISP / pppoe connection and found problems with the traffic PBR routed out th...
