Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
I have the second caseif 10.10.10.0 is not a directly connected network to the 1700 but is being routed via another interface from the 1700 router remote network then I could say you will need a route 192.168.2.0/24 on that far end router where 10.10...
Well, but if i add the routes in the tunnel and the far router has not routes to return the information i willn't see the remote networks.Example: ASA: 192.168.2.1 1700:192.168.1.1 FARouter: 192.168.1.254 Another net:10.10.10.0If no exist the route a...
The far router manage the routes to other cities that i need access, and how they don't create the route to know the network behind the tunnel i can't access to other cities, so if i could have the same network address in the ASA LAN i can routing ho...
Jorge, thath's rigthI have disimilar LANs with 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0 and in that case the tunnel is fine.The reason what i need to change the lan network in the ASA is because in the remote network there is an ISP that have the routes to access...
Ok, but when i make a Policy NAT i translate my LAN network to another ip that by routing can access to the remote network, but in my case i need thisI have an ASA 5505 and a 1700 router, they make the vpn and works fine, my asa has the LAN 192.168.2...