Heads Up :
The post you are writing will appear in a public forum. Please ensure all content is appropriate for public consumption. Review the employee guidelines for the community here.
Hi,I configured two 1710 routers for transparent bridging in a trunk (802.1q) link. The routers are connected with a tunnel, which also part of the bridge. For packets below 1468 bytes a ping between both end points works fine. A ping with bytes larg...
hi,I have two questions about pix 501 and logical interfaces (vlan's):1. is it possible for a pix 501 to create on the switch interface of the pix two VLAN's 1 for inside lan and 2 for DMZ?If so then I have 2 logical interface2. If it's possible to c...
Hello,I configured two 1710 routers for transparent bridging. The routers are connected with a tunnel, which also part of the bridge. I have tested the configuration and it works oke (see configuration below). But the routers need to be installed bet...
We have two routers. The ethernet interfaces are combined for LAN and WAN.both sides are connected via a wireless link.for back-up of the Wireless link, the isdn is used.The isdn link comes up if the route to 172.16.0.0 or 172.17.0.0 goes down, this ...
thanks for your comment,I have changed the IP MTU on the tunnel interface to 1430 bytes and even to 1400 bytes. But when I do a ping larger as 1468 bytes the pings will not be replied. Because I do a default ping in dos, the DF bit is not set. questi...
I thought that on a 802.1q link the MTU on the bridge interfaces changes of 1500 to 1524, because on a interface the MTU is max 1500 it has to be increased for the trunk.Is my theorie wrong? Why do you think, changing the MTU isn't necessary on ether...
Thanks for your answer, here's the complete config of both routers. I did added the "class dov" in a later stadium, without the class dov, see below, it was also not possible to make a call when pinging to the dialer interface of the PRI.1 must I als...
